Vaibhav Vinayak Gavande vs The State Of Maharashtra — 73/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU050008642026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
519/2026
Filing Date
10-Mar-2026
Registration No
73/2026
Registration Date
12-Mar-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur
Judge
3-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
63
Police Station
VEERGAON
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Vaibhav Vinayak Gavande
Adv. Nimbalkar S.P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.The State Of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: Vaibhav Vinayak Gavande v. State of Maharashtra (73/2026) The court allowed the application for return of seized property—a tractor and trailer seized in an illegal sand transportation case—after the applicant demonstrated ownership through an agreement with the registered owner and the owner's affidavit consenting to release. The court held that evidence could be preserved through panchnama (detailed inspection record) and ordered return of the vehicle upon execution of a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting disposal, alteration, or unauthorized use until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur
-
16-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur
-
13-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur
-
12-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 73/2026
Case Summary: Vaibhav Vinayak Gavande v. State of Maharashtra (73/2026) The court allowed the application for return of seized property—a tractor and trailer seized in an illegal sand transportation case—after the applicant demonstrated ownership through an agreement with the registered owner and the owner's affidavit consenting to release. The court held that evidence could be preserved through panchnama (detailed inspection record) and ordered return of the vehicle upon execution of a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting disposal, alteration, or unauthorized use until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts