Vaibhav Vinayak Gavande vs The State Of Maharashtra — 73/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU050008642026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

10-03-2026

Filing Number

519/2026

Filing Date

10-03-2026

Registration No

73/2026

Registration Date

12-03-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur

Judge

3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR

Decision Date

17th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

FIR Details

FIR Number

63

Police Station

VEERGAON

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Vaibhav Vinayak Gavande

Adv. Nimbalkar S.P.

Respondent(s)

The State Of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 3-JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR

17-03-2026

Disposed

16-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

13-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

12-03-2026

Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

Final Orders / Judgements

17-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Vaibhav Vinayak Gavande v. State of Maharashtra (73/2026) The court allowed the application for return of seized property—a tractor and trailer seized in an illegal sand transportation case—after the applicant demonstrated ownership through an agreement with the registered owner and the owner's affidavit consenting to release. The court held that evidence could be preserved through panchnama (detailed inspection record) and ordered return of the vehicle upon execution of a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting disposal, alteration, or unauthorized use until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Vaibhav Vinayak Gavande v. State of Maharashtra (73/2026) The court allowed the application for return of seized property—a tractor and trailer seized in an illegal sand transportation case—after the applicant demonstrated ownership through an agreement with the registered owner and the owner's affidavit consenting to release. The court held that evidence could be preserved through panchnama (detailed inspection record) and ordered return of the vehicle upon execution of a Rs. 10 lakh indemnity bond with conditions prohibiting disposal, alteration, or unauthorized use until case conclusion. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case