Rashid Mohmmad Inamdar vs Ismail Mohmmad Inamdar Advocate - Sayyed Y.A. — 143/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 94. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

Issues Next hearing 08-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU050008382024

e-Filing Number

22-03-2024

Filing Number

385/2024

Filing Date

27-Mar-2024

Registration No

143/2024

Registration Date

28-Mar-2024

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur

Judge

5-Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 94

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Rashid Mohmmad Inamdar

    Adv. Bhusare A.M.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ismail Mohmmad Inamdar Advocate - Sayyed Y.A.

  2. 2.Usman Ismail Inamdar

    Adv. Sayyed Y.A.

  3. 3.Salman Ismail Inamdar

  4. 4.Parvin Ismail Inamdar

  5. 5.Aishabi Ismail Inamdar Urf Aishabi Taufiq Inamdar

Case History

  1. 08-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  3. 21-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 143/2024 Summary: Rashid Mohammad Inamdar's petition for temporary injunction against respondents regarding a 10-foot access road was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner had an alternative route available and failed to establish urgency or irreparable harm warranting interim relief. The court imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 on the petitioner for filing the petition without merit (Order dated 22.01.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Order

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  6. 12-Jan-2026

    Order

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  7. 09-Jan-2026

    Order

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  8. 08-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  9. 05-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  10. 23-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  11. 06-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  12. 19-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  13. 19-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  14. 21-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  15. 24-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  16. 21-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  17. 04-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  18. 30-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  19. 20-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  20. 18-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  21. 18-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  22. 23-Aug-2024

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  23. 29-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  24. 29-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  25. 10-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  26. 10-May-2024

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  27. 29-Apr-2024

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  28. 30-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 27-Mar-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 143/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case 143/2024 Summary: Rashid Mohammad Inamdar's petition for temporary injunction against respondents regarding a 10-foot access road was dismissed. The court found that the petitioner had an alternative route available and failed to establish urgency or irreparable harm warranting interim relief. The court imposed costs of Rs. 5,000 on the petitioner for filing the petition without merit (Order dated 22.01.2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case