Jyoti Ashok Jagtap vs Jogendra Nanaji Pagare — 86/2026
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34,38. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU050007992026
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
e-Filing Number
04-03-2026
Filing Number
320/2026
Filing Date
05-03-2026
Registration No
86/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur
Judge
2-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Jyoti Ashok Jagtap
Adv. Shinde R.H.
Respondent(s)
Jogendra Nanaji Pagare
Shakuntala Rajendra Nannaware
Sandhya Sudhir Jadhav
Pornima Hiraman Nikale
Pradnya Vijay Pandit
Hearing History
Judge: 2-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Appearance |
| 24-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 13-04-2026 | Appearance |
| 30-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 86/2026 The court declined to grant an ex-parte injunction against the defendants at this stage. Instead, a show cause notice was issued to defendants Jogendra Nanaji Pagare, Shakuntala Rajendra Nannaware, and Sandhya Sudhir Jadhav, requiring them to file their response explaining why an ex-parte injunction should not be granted. The case is adjourned pending the defendants' reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: R.C.S. No. 86/2026 The court declined to grant an ex-parte injunction against the defendants at this stage. Instead, a show cause notice was issued to defendants Jogendra Nanaji Pagare, Shakuntala Rajendra Nannaware, and Sandhya Sudhir Jadhav, requiring them to file their response explaining why an ex-parte injunction should not be granted. The case is adjourned pending the defendants' reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts