State of Maharashtra vs Annasaheb Bhanudas Gaidhane — 129/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 118(2),118(2),115(2),352,351(2),351(3),3(5). Status: Charge. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU050007412026
Filing Number
456/2026
Filing Date
26-Feb-2026
Registration No
129/2026
Registration Date
26-Feb-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur
Judge
3-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
387
Police Station
VEERGAON
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
-
1.Annasaheb Bhanudas Gaidhane
-
2.Kiran Aannsaheb Gaidhane
-
3.Bhaiyasaheb Subhash Gaidhane
-
4.Rahul Subhash Gaidhane
Case History
-
22-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Charge
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur
-
27-Mar-2026
Charge
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur
-
12-Mar-2026
Charge
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur
-
27-Feb-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: R.C.C. No. 129/2026 Accused Kiran Annasaheb Gaidhane's bail application was rejected by the Judicial Magistrate on 27.02.2026. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in the assault case (charges under BNS 2023 Sections 118, 115, 351, 352), noting serious injuries to the informant and risk of witness tampering. The court rejected the argument that filing of charge-sheet constituted change-in-circumstances, citing Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Feb-2026
Appearance
Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur
-
26-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 129/2026
Case Summary: R.C.C. No. 129/2026 Accused Kiran Annasaheb Gaidhane's bail application was rejected by the Judicial Magistrate on 27.02.2026. The court found prima facie evidence of his involvement in the assault case (charges under BNS 2023 Sections 118, 115, 351, 352), noting serious injuries to the informant and risk of witness tampering. The court rejected the argument that filing of charge-sheet constituted change-in-circumstances, citing Supreme Court precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts