Lokesh Satish Raka vs Chandrakala Muktaram Suryavanshi — 105/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 12-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU050006392025

e-Filing Number

25-02-2025

Filing Number

307/2025

Filing Date

25-Feb-2025

Registration No

105/2025

Registration Date

27-Feb-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur

Judge

5-Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
Code of Civil Procedure Section O39R1AND2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lokesh Satish Raka

    Adv. Tribhuvan K.S.

  2. 2.Sandip Subhash Sanklecha

    Adv. TRIBHUVAN KIRANKUMAR SURYABHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chandrakala Muktaram Suryavanshi

  2. 2.Sakharbai Annasaheb Sarode

  3. 3.Gangamai Industries And Construction Pra Li

  4. 4.Bhagwat janardhan Pohare

  5. 5.Suwarna Rajendra Magar

  6. 6.Anita Raosaheb Gaikwad

  7. 7.Mangal Sharad Talekar

  8. 8.Sumanbai Urf Kanchanbai Sarode

Case History

  1. 12-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  3. 22-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  4. 19-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  5. 07-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  6. 02-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    Jt CIVIL Judge Senior Division And Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate Vaijapur

  7. 09-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    III Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  8. 20-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    III Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  9. 06-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    III Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  10. 05-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: RCS No. 105/2025 The court rejected plaintiffs' application for ex-parte status quo on the property. Finding insufficient grounds—including lack of proof of plaintiffs' possession, discrepancies between property descriptions, missing defendant affidavits, and no current property documentation—the judge ruled an interim injunction cannot be granted without hearing the defendants. Urgent notice was issued to defendants to show cause against the status quo order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  11. 05-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    III Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  12. 04-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    III Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  13. 03-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    III Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  14. 01-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    III Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  15. 28-Feb-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  16. 28-Feb-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  17. 28-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  18. 25-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 105/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 105/2025 The court rejected plaintiffs' application for ex-parte status quo on the property. Finding insufficient grounds—including lack of proof of plaintiffs' possession, discrepancies between property descriptions, missing defendant affidavits, and no current property documentation—the judge ruled an interim injunction cannot be granted without hearing the defendants. Urgent notice was issued to defendants to show cause against the status quo order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case