Lokesh Satish Raka vs Chandrakala Muktaram Suryavanshi — 105/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU050006392025

Appearance

Next Hearing

12th June 2026

e-Filing Number

25-02-2025

Filing Number

307/2025

Filing Date

25-02-2025

Registration No

105/2025

Registration Date

27-02-2025

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur

Judge

5-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AND ADDL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VAIJAPUR

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section O39R1AND2

Petitioner(s)

Lokesh Satish Raka

Adv. Tribhuvan K.S.

Sandip Subhash Sanklecha

Adv. TRIBHUVAN KIRANKUMAR SURYABHAN

Respondent(s)

Chandrakala Muktaram Suryavanshi

Sakharbai Annasaheb Sarode

Gangamai Industries And Construction Pra Li

Bhagwat janardhan Pohare

Suwarna Rajendra Magar

Anita Raosaheb Gaikwad

Mangal Sharad Talekar

Sumanbai Urf Kanchanbai Sarode

Hearing History

Judge: 5-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AND ADDL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VAIJAPUR

12-03-2026

Appearance

22-01-2026

Appearance

19-11-2025

Appearance

07-10-2025

Appearance

02-09-2025

Appearance

Interim Orders

05-03-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS No. 105/2025 The court rejected plaintiffs' application for ex-parte status quo on the property. Finding insufficient grounds—including lack of proof of plaintiffs' possession, discrepancies between property descriptions, missing defendant affidavits, and no current property documentation—the judge ruled an interim injunction cannot be granted without hearing the defendants. Urgent notice was issued to defendants to show cause against the status quo order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 105/2025 The court rejected plaintiffs' application for ex-parte status quo on the property. Finding insufficient grounds—including lack of proof of plaintiffs' possession, discrepancies between property descriptions, missing defendant affidavits, and no current property documentation—the judge ruled an interim injunction cannot be granted without hearing the defendants. Urgent notice was issued to defendants to show cause against the status quo order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case