Lokesh Satish Raka vs Chandrakala Muktaram Suryavanshi — 105/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU050006392025
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
e-Filing Number
25-02-2025
Filing Number
307/2025
Filing Date
25-02-2025
Registration No
105/2025
Registration Date
27-02-2025
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur
Judge
5-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AND ADDL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VAIJAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Lokesh Satish Raka
Adv. Tribhuvan K.S.
Sandip Subhash Sanklecha
Adv. TRIBHUVAN KIRANKUMAR SURYABHAN
Respondent(s)
Chandrakala Muktaram Suryavanshi
Sakharbai Annasaheb Sarode
Gangamai Industries And Construction Pra Li
Bhagwat janardhan Pohare
Suwarna Rajendra Magar
Anita Raosaheb Gaikwad
Mangal Sharad Talekar
Sumanbai Urf Kanchanbai Sarode
Hearing History
Judge: 5-JT CIVIL JUDGE SENIOR DIVISION AND ADDL CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE VAIJAPUR
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Appearance |
| 22-01-2026 | Appearance |
| 19-11-2025 | Appearance |
| 07-10-2025 | Appearance |
| 02-09-2025 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 105/2025 The court rejected plaintiffs' application for ex-parte status quo on the property. Finding insufficient grounds—including lack of proof of plaintiffs' possession, discrepancies between property descriptions, missing defendant affidavits, and no current property documentation—the judge ruled an interim injunction cannot be granted without hearing the defendants. Urgent notice was issued to defendants to show cause against the status quo order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 105/2025 The court rejected plaintiffs' application for ex-parte status quo on the property. Finding insufficient grounds—including lack of proof of plaintiffs' possession, discrepancies between property descriptions, missing defendant affidavits, and no current property documentation—the judge ruled an interim injunction cannot be granted without hearing the defendants. Urgent notice was issued to defendants to show cause against the status quo order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts