Azhar Kamar Shaikh vs Majed Shaikhlal Patel — 243/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 13th June 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 13-Jun-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU050005732026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

370/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

243/2026

Registration Date

16-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur

Judge

3-Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Azhar Kamar Shaikh

    Adv. Dhage V.D.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Majed Shaikhlal Patel

Case History

  1. 13-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  3. 18-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Judicial Magistrate found that petitioner Azhar Kamar Shaikh established a prima facie case against respondent Majed Shaikhlal Patel. The court issued process and summons against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, to be served by usual mode and speed post. Guidelines on compounding of the offense were incorporated in the summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Verification

    Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  6. 16-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 243/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate found that petitioner Azhar Kamar Shaikh established a prima facie case against respondent Majed Shaikhlal Patel. The court issued process and summons against the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, to be served by usual mode and speed post. Guidelines on compounding of the offense were incorporated in the summons. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case