Prakash Eknath Sarode vs Sahebrao Kamlakar Pawar — 47/2026

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38. Status: Appearance. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Appearance Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU050005492026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

190/2026

Filing Date

10-Feb-2026

Registration No

47/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur

Judge

2-II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38
Code of Civil Procedure Section Order39Rule1And2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Prakash Eknath Sarode

    Adv. Baig J.N.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sahebrao Kamlakar Pawar

  2. 2.Shakuntala Kamlakar Pawar

  3. 3.President Navjivan Housing Society

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 09-Apr-2026

    Appearance

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    II Jt. CIVIL Judge J.D. J.M.F.C. Vaijapur

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  5. 12-Feb-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: The court rejected the petitioner's request for an ex-parte injunction against the defendants. Instead, the court issued a show cause notice to defendants Sahebrao Kamlakar Pawar, Shakuntala Kamlakar Pawar, and President Navjivan Housing Society, requiring them to file their response explaining why an ex-parte injunction should not be granted. The case was adjourned pending the defendants' reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 10-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 47/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court rejected the petitioner's request for an ex-parte injunction against the defendants. Instead, the court issued a show cause notice to defendants Sahebrao Kamlakar Pawar, Shakuntala Kamlakar Pawar, and President Navjivan Housing Society, requiring them to file their response explaining why an ex-parte injunction should not be granted. The case was adjourned pending the defendants' reply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case