Sarala Prakash Londhe vs Anusaya Daulatrao Shelke — 32/2026
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 54AndOrder39Rule1And2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.
R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit
CNR: MHAU050003602026
Next Hearing
08th July 2026
e-Filing Number
27-01-2026
Filing Number
118/2026
Filing Date
27-01-2026
Registration No
32/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur
Judge
2-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sarala Prakash Londhe
Adv. Borade N.R.
Shobha Balu Autade
Adv. BORADE NITIN RAYBHAN
Respondent(s)
Anusaya Daulatrao Shelke
Bhausaheb Daulatrao Shelke
Dashrath Daulatrao Shelke
Ganesh Daulatrao Shelke
Vitthal Daulatrao Shelke
Hearing History
Judge: 2-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR
Evidence
Order on Exh
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Argument on Exh.____Unready
Appearance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 20-04-2026 | Order on Exh |
| 17-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 10-04-2026 | Argument on Exh.____Unready |
| 02-04-2026 | Appearance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: RCS No. 32/2026 Sarala Prakash Londhe and Shobha Balu Autade filed a partition suit against Anusaya Daulatrao Shelke and others regarding ancestral property. The court framed four key issues for determination: whether the suit property is ancestral property of both parties; whether defendants proved prior partition by mutation entry 1839; whether plaintiffs are entitled to partition relief and respective shares; and the final order and decree. The case was adjourned on 24.04.2026 with parties directed to note the issues for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: RCS No. 32/2026 Sarala Prakash Londhe and Shobha Balu Autade filed a partition suit against Anusaya Daulatrao Shelke and others regarding ancestral property. The court framed four key issues for determination: whether the suit property is ancestral property of both parties; whether defendants proved prior partition by mutation entry 1839; whether plaintiffs are entitled to partition relief and respective shares; and the final order and decree. The case was adjourned on 24.04.2026 with parties directed to note the issues for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts