Sarala Prakash Londhe vs Anusaya Daulatrao Shelke — 32/2026

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 54AndOrder39Rule1And2. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 08th July 2026.

R.C.S. - Regular Civil Suit

CNR: MHAU050003602026

Evidence

Next Hearing

08th July 2026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

118/2026

Filing Date

27-01-2026

Registration No

32/2026

Registration Date

28-01-2026

Court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur

Judge

2-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CIVIL PROCEDURE Section 54AndOrder39Rule1And2
HINDU SUCCESSION ACT Section 8And9

Petitioner(s)

Sarala Prakash Londhe

Adv. Borade N.R.

Shobha Balu Autade

Adv. BORADE NITIN RAYBHAN

Respondent(s)

Anusaya Daulatrao Shelke

Bhausaheb Daulatrao Shelke

Dashrath Daulatrao Shelke

Ganesh Daulatrao Shelke

Vitthal Daulatrao Shelke

Hearing History

Judge: 2-II JT. CIVIL JUDGE J.D. J.M.F.C. VAIJAPUR

24-04-2026

Evidence

20-04-2026

Order on Exh

17-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

10-04-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

02-04-2026

Appearance

Interim Orders

29-01-2026
Order on T.I.
24-04-2026
Order on T.I.
24-04-2026
Issues

Case Summary: RCS No. 32/2026 Sarala Prakash Londhe and Shobha Balu Autade filed a partition suit against Anusaya Daulatrao Shelke and others regarding ancestral property. The court framed four key issues for determination: whether the suit property is ancestral property of both parties; whether defendants proved prior partition by mutation entry 1839; whether plaintiffs are entitled to partition relief and respective shares; and the final order and decree. The case was adjourned on 24.04.2026 with parties directed to note the issues for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No. 32/2026 Sarala Prakash Londhe and Shobha Balu Autade filed a partition suit against Anusaya Daulatrao Shelke and others regarding ancestral property. The court framed four key issues for determination: whether the suit property is ancestral property of both parties; whether defendants proved prior partition by mutation entry 1839; whether plaintiffs are entitled to partition relief and respective shares; and the final order and decree. The case was adjourned on 24.04.2026 with parties directed to note the issues for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil and Criminal Court, Vaijapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case