State of Maharashtra vs Sunil Gorakh Battise Advocate - Baig J.N. — 66/2021
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 363,366,376(2)(N). Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 04th May 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHAU040009362021
Filing Number
551/2021
Filing Date
18-11-2021
Registration No
66/2021
Registration Date
18-11-2021
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vaijapur
Judge
3-DIST. JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, VAIJAPUR
Decision Date
04th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
323
Police Station
VAIJAPUR
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Sunil Gorakh Battise Advocate - Baig J.N.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DIST. JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, VAIJAPUR
Disposed
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 30-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 27-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 18-04-2026 | Arguments |
| 09-04-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sunil Gorakh Battise (66/2021) Decision: The court acquitted the accused Sunil Gorakh Battise of charges under IPC Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(N), and POCSO Act Section 4. The prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While the victim and her mother acknowledged that the victim married the accused and have two children together, both witnesses contradicted the prosecution's core allegations of abduction and sexual assault. The prosecution produced no independent corroborating evidence, medical reports, or contemporaneous documentation of the victim's age, undermining their case. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and inconsistent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Sunil Gorakh Battise (66/2021) Decision: The court acquitted the accused Sunil Gorakh Battise of charges under IPC Sections 363, 366, 376(2)(N), and POCSO Act Section 4. The prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: While the victim and her mother acknowledged that the victim married the accused and have two children together, both witnesses contradicted the prosecution's core allegations of abduction and sexual assault. The prosecution produced no independent corroborating evidence, medical reports, or contemporaneous documentation of the victim's age, undermining their case. The court found the prosecution's evidence insufficient and inconsistent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts