State of Maharashtra vs Sham Badod Bhosale — 429/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 395,397. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 04th June 2026.
Spl.Case - Special Case (Sessions)
CNR: MHAU040009202024
Next Hearing
04th June 2026
Filing Number
705/2024
Filing Date
08-05-2024
Registration No
429/2024
Registration Date
08-05-2024
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vaijapur
Judge
3-DIST. JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, VAIJAPUR
FIR Details
FIR Number
296
Police Station
SHIVOOR
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Sham Badod Bhosale
Pandurang Bharam Bhosale
Sagar Ratan Bhosale
Raosaheb Bhimrao Pagare
Dhiraj Bharam Bhosale
Parmeshwar Dilip Kale
Amit @ Aminkhan Kagad Chavan
Shankar Ratan Bhosale
Ajay Chhanandu Kale
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DIST. JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, VAIJAPUR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 07-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 23-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 09-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 28-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case 429/2024 Summary: Accused Amit Kagad Chavan's bail application under Section 439 CrPC was rejected on 27-12-2024. The court found prima-facie material against him for alleged dacoity and organized crime charges arising from a November 2023 armed robbery where ornaments and a mobile phone worth Rs. 45,000 were snatched. Co-accused confessions placed him at the crime scene, and his history of multiple offences across various police stations weighed against bail eligibility under the MCOC Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 429/2024 Summary: Accused Amit Kagad Chavan's bail application under Section 439 CrPC was rejected on 27-12-2024. The court found prima-facie material against him for alleged dacoity and organized crime charges arising from a November 2023 armed robbery where ornaments and a mobile phone worth Rs. 45,000 were snatched. Co-accused confessions placed him at the crime scene, and his history of multiple offences across various police stations weighed against bail eligibility under the MCOC Act. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts