The State of Maharashtra vs Balande Shakuntal Bhosale Advocate - Uke S.M. — 1600191/2012
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 397. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 22nd April 2026.
Sessions Case
CNR: MHAU040008672012
Filing Number
1600293/2012
Filing Date
18-07-2012
Registration No
1600191/2012
Registration Date
18-07-2012
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vaijapur
Judge
3-DIST. JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, VAIJAPUR
Decision Date
22nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Balande Shakuntal Bhosale Advocate - Uke S.M.
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DIST. JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, VAIJAPUR
Disposed
Judgment
Judgment
Arguments
Arguments
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 17-04-2026 | Judgment |
| 28-03-2026 | Arguments |
| 20-03-2026 | Arguments |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 191/2012 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted all seven absconding accused (Balande Shakuntal Bhosle, Pratap Ranganath Bhosle, Jaising Gavchand Kale, Kagdya Maroti Chavan, Dastya Maroti Chavan, Habukya Maroti Chavan, and Ravya Hiwaldar Bhosle) of robbery charges under IPC Section 397. The court found insufficient evidence—the key witness failed to identify accused, no identification parade was conducted, and the 35-year delay undermined case credibility despite the robbery allegation against tanker workers in 1990. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Sessions Case No. 191/2012 Court Decision: The Additional Sessions Judge acquitted all seven absconding accused (Balande Shakuntal Bhosle, Pratap Ranganath Bhosle, Jaising Gavchand Kale, Kagdya Maroti Chavan, Dastya Maroti Chavan, Habukya Maroti Chavan, and Ravya Hiwaldar Bhosle) of robbery charges under IPC Section 397. The court found insufficient evidence—the key witness failed to identify accused, no identification parade was conducted, and the 35-year delay undermined case credibility despite the robbery allegation against tanker workers in 1990. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts