State of Maharashtra vs Shri Pravin Sudhakar Inamdar Advocate - Katare S.B. — 8/2016
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7,12,13(1)(D),13(2). Status: Compliance. Next hearing: 15th June 2026.
Spl.Case ACB - Special Case under Prevention of Corruption Act
CNR: MHAU040006942016
Next Hearing
15th June 2026
Filing Number
506/2016
Filing Date
22-09-2016
Registration No
8/2016
Registration Date
22-09-2016
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vaijapur
Judge
4-ADHOC DIST JUDGE-1 AND ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE VAIJAPUR
FIR Details
FIR Number
3060
Police Station
VAIJAPUR
Year
2016
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Shri Pravin Sudhakar Inamdar Advocate - Katare S.B.
Ganesh Subhash Ghongte
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADHOC DIST JUDGE-1 AND ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE VAIJAPUR
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
Compliance
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 18-05-2026 | Compliance |
| 29-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 09-04-2026 | Compliance |
| 12-03-2026 | Compliance |
| 09-02-2026 | Compliance |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Special Case ACB No. 08/2016 The court allowed the prosecution's application directing the Assistant Superintendent of District Court, Vaijapur to verify and certify that voice recording transcriptions and sample voice panchanama recorded on a memory card match the written script panchanama filed with the charge sheet. The court rejected the accused's objection that the case was over five years old, finding verification essential for just adjudication under Rule 24 of the Criminal Manual. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Special Case ACB No. 08/2016 The court allowed the prosecution's application directing the Assistant Superintendent of District Court, Vaijapur to verify and certify that voice recording transcriptions and sample voice panchanama recorded on a memory card match the written script panchanama filed with the charge sheet. The court rejected the accused's objection that the case was over five years old, finding verification essential for just adjudication under Rule 24 of the Criminal Manual. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts