Shivam Urf Rocky Subhash Suradkar vs State of Maharashtra — 24/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 25th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU040002152026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
67/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
24/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vaijapur
Judge
3-DIST. JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, VAIJAPUR
Decision Date
25th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
162
Police Station
VAIJAPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shivam Urf Rocky Subhash Suradkar
Adv. Varpe D.B.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DIST. JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, VAIJAPUR
Disposed
Dismissal Order
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 25-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 24-03-2026 | Dismissal Order |
| 20-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 17-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
| 16-03-2026 | Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court rejected Shivam alias Rocky Subhash Suradkar's bail application in a serious robbery case involving kidnapping, assault, and extortion of Rs. 6,300 and valuables from a laborer. The Additional Sessions Judge found the offense grave, investigation at an early stage with pending identification parade and absconding co-accused, and concluded the applicant failed bail parameters given risks of evidence tampering and flight from justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court rejected Shivam alias Rocky Subhash Suradkar's bail application in a serious robbery case involving kidnapping, assault, and extortion of Rs. 6,300 and valuables from a laborer. The Additional Sessions Judge found the offense grave, investigation at an early stage with pending identification parade and absconding co-accused, and concluded the applicant failed bail parameters given risks of evidence tampering and flight from justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts