Sachin Balu Gore vs State of Maharashtra — 22/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU040002042026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
64/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
22/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vaijapur
Judge
3-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaijapur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
162
Police Station
VAIJAPUR
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sachin Balu Gore
Adv. Baig J.N.
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on Exhibit
Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 22/2026 - Sachin Balu Gore v. State of Maharashtra The court rejected Sachin Balu Gore's bail application in a serious robbery and assault case involving the abduction, robbery, and extortion of a laborer. The court found the investigation was at an initial stage with key tasks pending (identification parade, weapon seizure, arrest of absconding co-accused) and cited risks of witness tampering and flight from justice to deny bail despite the applicant's arguments of false implication and young age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaijapur
-
12-Mar-2026
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaijapur
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 22/2026
Summary: Criminal Bail Application No. 22/2026 - Sachin Balu Gore v. State of Maharashtra The court rejected Sachin Balu Gore's bail application in a serious robbery and assault case involving the abduction, robbery, and extortion of a laborer. The court found the investigation was at an initial stage with key tasks pending (identification parade, weapon seizure, arrest of absconding co-accused) and cited risks of witness tampering and flight from justice to deny bail despite the applicant's arguments of false implication and young age. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts