Rahul Dattu Salunke vs State of Maharashtra — 21/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU040001942026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
61/2026
Filing Date
07-Mar-2026
Registration No
21/2026
Registration Date
07-Mar-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vaijapur
Judge
3-Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaijapur
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
Last updated 29-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
VEERGAON
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Rahul Dattu Salunke
Adv. Taru D.K.
Respondent(s)
-
1.State of Maharashtra
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Summary of Criminal Bail Application No. 21/2026 The court rejected Rahul Dattu Salunke's bail application in a case involving charges under BNS sections 137(2), 64(1), 87, and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6. The accused, a 31-year-old married man, eloped with a 17-year-old minor girl and engaged in sexual relations with her at multiple locations. The court found prima facie evidence of sexual assault and held that the serious nature of the offense, ongoing investigation, risk of witness tampering, and flight risk justified denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaijapur
-
12-Mar-2026
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Dist. Judge-1 And Addl. Sessions Judge, Vaijapur
-
07-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 21/2026
Summary of Criminal Bail Application No. 21/2026 The court rejected Rahul Dattu Salunke's bail application in a case involving charges under BNS sections 137(2), 64(1), 87, and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6. The accused, a 31-year-old married man, eloped with a 17-year-old minor girl and engaged in sexual relations with her at multiple locations. The court found prima facie evidence of sexual assault and held that the serious nature of the offense, ongoing investigation, risk of witness tampering, and flight risk justified denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts