Rahul Dattu Salunke vs State of Maharashtra — 21/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 13th March 2026.
Cri.Bail Appln. - Bail Application
CNR: MHAU040001942026
e-Filing Number
06-03-2026
Filing Number
61/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
21/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vaijapur
Judge
3-DIST. JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, VAIJAPUR
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
22
Police Station
VEERGAON
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Rahul Dattu Salunke
Adv. Taru D.K.
Respondent(s)
State of Maharashtra
Hearing History
Judge: 3-DIST. JUDGE-1 AND ADDL. SESSIONS JUDGE, VAIJAPUR
Disposed
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
Filing of Say on Exh___Ready
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 12-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
| 07-03-2026 | Filing of Say on Exh___Ready |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Criminal Bail Application No. 21/2026 The court rejected Rahul Dattu Salunke's bail application in a case involving charges under BNS sections 137(2), 64(1), 87, and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6. The accused, a 31-year-old married man, eloped with a 17-year-old minor girl and engaged in sexual relations with her at multiple locations. The court found prima facie evidence of sexual assault and held that the serious nature of the offense, ongoing investigation, risk of witness tampering, and flight risk justified denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Criminal Bail Application No. 21/2026 The court rejected Rahul Dattu Salunke's bail application in a case involving charges under BNS sections 137(2), 64(1), 87, and POCSO Act sections 4 and 6. The accused, a 31-year-old married man, eloped with a 17-year-old minor girl and engaged in sexual relations with her at multiple locations. The court found prima facie evidence of sexual assault and held that the serious nature of the offense, ongoing investigation, risk of witness tampering, and flight risk justified denial of bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts