State of Maharashtra vs Shri Shriram Tukaram Choudhari Advocate - Sengaonkar C.P. — 1/2016
Case under Prevention of Corruption Act Section 7,12,13(1)(D),13(2). Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU040001882016
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
139/2016
Filing Date
09-03-2016
Registration No
1/2016
Registration Date
11-03-2016
Court
District and Additional Sessions Court, Vaijapur
Judge
4-ADHOC DIST JUDGE-1 AND ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE VAIJAPUR
FIR Details
FIR Number
3004
Police Station
SHIVOOR
Year
2015
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Shri Shriram Tukaram Choudhari Advocate - Sengaonkar C.P.
Hearing History
Judge: 4-ADHOC DIST JUDGE-1 AND ADDL SESSIONS JUDGE VAIJAPUR
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-05-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 28-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 02-04-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 12-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
In SPL(ACB) Case No.01/2016, the accused's advocate requested permission to cross-examine PW2 via video conferencing due to medical treatment in Pune. The Special Judge rejected the application because it failed to specify the remote location from which the advocate would participate and did not identify a coordinator to ensure fair proceedings, both mandatory requirements under Maharashtra's video conferencing rules 5.3.10. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In SPL(ACB) Case No.01/2016, the accused's advocate requested permission to cross-examine PW2 via video conferencing due to medical treatment in Pune. The Special Judge rejected the application because it failed to specify the remote location from which the advocate would participate and did not identify a coordinator to ensure fair proceedings, both mandatory requirements under Maharashtra's video conferencing rules 5.3.10. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts