Trimurti Urban Nidhi Ltd Shekta Dist Aurangabad vs Shivaji Sudhakar Jumbad — 20655/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU030261772024
e-Filing Number
17-10-2024
Filing Number
26173/2024
Filing Date
21-Oct-2024
Registration No
20655/2024
Registration Date
25-Oct-2024
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad
Judge
4-VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Trimurti Urban Nidhi Ltd Shekta Dist Aurangabad
Adv. Khaire S.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shivaji Sudhakar Jumbad
Case History
-
25-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
24-Nov-2025
Awaiting Summons
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
08-Aug-2025
Awaiting Summons
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
25-Apr-2025
Awaiting Summons
V Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
03-Feb-2025
Awaiting Summons
XI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
07-Nov-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary (20655/2024): The JMFC Aurangabad took cognizance of a cheque bounce complaint filed by Trimurti Urban Nidhi Ltd against Shivaji Sudhakar Jumbad under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The court found prima-facie evidence that the accused signed the cheque and all essential ingredients of the offense were established. Process has been issued against the accused to answer the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-Nov-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 20655/2024
Case Summary (20655/2024): The JMFC Aurangabad took cognizance of a cheque bounce complaint filed by Trimurti Urban Nidhi Ltd against Shivaji Sudhakar Jumbad under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The court found prima-facie evidence that the accused signed the cheque and all essential ingredients of the offense were established. Process has been issued against the accused to answer the charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts