Hdfc Bank Limited vs Atish Nilkanth Patil — 12865/2024

Case under Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 Section 25. Disposed: Uncontested--LOKADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU030160712024

e-Filing Number

02-07-2024

Filing Number

16067/2024

Filing Date

05-Jul-2024

Registration No

12865/2024

Registration Date

10-Jul-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

5-XII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOKADALAT

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Payment and Settlement Systems Act, 2007 Section 25

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Hdfc Bank Limited

    Adv. Gangapurkar A.D.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Atish Nilkanth Patil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: HDFC Bank Limited withdrew its complaint against Atish Nilkanth Patil after the parties mutually settled their dispute. The 12th JMFC Aurangabad approved the withdrawal, and subsequently the Lok Adalat issued an award recognizing the settlement. Court fees paid were ordered to be refunded to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    XII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    XII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  5. 19-Nov-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    XII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  6. 18-Jun-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  7. 05-Nov-2024

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  8. 05-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 05-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12865/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: HDFC Bank Limited withdrew its complaint against Atish Nilkanth Patil after the parties mutually settled their dispute. The 12th JMFC Aurangabad approved the withdrawal, and subsequently the Lok Adalat issued an award recognizing the settlement. Court fees paid were ordered to be refunded to the complainant. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case