Asefa Begum Azharuddin Shaikh vs Azharuddin Shaikh Kadir Advocate - Kidwai N.A. — 376/2025

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 11-Jun-2026

PWDVA Appln. - Application under Domestic Violence Act

CNR: MHAU030149772025

e-Filing Number

27-06-2025

Filing Number

14977/2025

Filing Date

30-Jun-2025

Registration No

376/2025

Registration Date

30-Jun-2025

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

4-VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

219

Police Station

SATARA KHANDOBA

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22
Ia/1/2026 Classification : Interim Maintenance Section Asefa Begum Azharuddin ShaikhAzharuddin Shaikh Kadir

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Asefa Begum Azharuddin Shaikh

    Adv. Shaikh A.O.

  2. 2.Aiman Azharuddin Shaikh

    Adv. SHAIKH ABBAS OSMAN

  3. 3.Arshan Azharuddin Shaikh

    Adv. SHAIKH ABBAS OSMAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Azharuddin Shaikh Kadir Advocate - Kidwai N.A.

  2. 2.Shaikh Kadir Shaikh Hasan

    Adv. Kidwai N.A.

  3. 3.Rukshana Shaikh Kadir

    Adv. Kidwai N.A.

  4. 4.Shaikh Abjur Shaikh Kadir

    Adv. Kidwai N.A.

  5. 5.Amrin Nasim Shaikh

    Adv. Kidwai N.A.

  6. 6.Afreen Atikh Shaikh

    Adv. Kidwai N.A.

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 376/2025 Court: First Class Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 6, Aurangabad Date: 08/04/2026 Outcome: Petition partially allowed. The court granted interim maintenance to petitioner Asefa Begum of Rs. 8,000/- per month from respondent Azharuddin Shaikh (Respondent 1), effective from the date of petition filing. Additionally, Rs. 2,000/- was awarded toward case expenses. The petitioner's original claim of Rs. 20,000/- per month was reduced considering the respondent's actual financial capacity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  4. 02-Apr-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  7. 17-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  9. 22-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  10. 08-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  11. 20-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  12. 04-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  13. 20-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  14. 06-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  15. 25-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  16. 04-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  17. 08-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  18. 05-Jul-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  19. 05-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  20. 30-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 376/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 376/2025 Court: First Class Judicial Magistrate, Court No. 6, Aurangabad Date: 08/04/2026 Outcome: Petition partially allowed. The court granted interim maintenance to petitioner Asefa Begum of Rs. 8,000/- per month from respondent Azharuddin Shaikh (Respondent 1), effective from the date of petition filing. Additionally, Rs. 2,000/- was awarded toward case expenses. The petitioner's original claim of Rs. 20,000/- per month was reduced considering the respondent's actual financial capacity. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case