The State of Maharashtra vs Tushar Raju Rajan Rajput — 9803/2019
Case under Immoral Traffic (Prevention) Act Section 3,4,5. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 06th August 2026.
R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case
CNR: MHAU030138732019
Next Hearing
06th August 2026
Filing Number
13870/2019
Filing Date
16-08-2019
Registration No
9803/2019
Registration Date
16-08-2019
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad
Judge
4-VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
FIR Details
FIR Number
256
Police Station
SATARA KHANDOBA
Year
2019
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State of Maharashtra
Respondent(s)
Tushar Raju Rajan Rajput
Pravin Balaji Kurkute
Hearing History
Judge: 4-VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-05-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 04-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 12-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 07-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: SCC No. 9803/2019 Tushar Raju Rajan Rajput and Pravin Balaji Kurkute sought bail in a human trafficking case involving alleged brothel operations. The court rejected their bail application on 29 August 2019, finding that both accused had extensive criminal records with multiple prior convictions under the Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act and related offences, and that they were caught red-handed providing victims for prostitution. The court determined that releasing them posed a risk of reoffending and that grounds cited for bail were baseless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: SCC No. 9803/2019 Tushar Raju Rajan Rajput and Pravin Balaji Kurkute sought bail in a human trafficking case involving alleged brothel operations. The court rejected their bail application on 29 August 2019, finding that both accused had extensive criminal records with multiple prior convictions under the Prevention of Immoral Traffic Act and related offences, and that they were caught red-handed providing victims for prostitution. The court determined that releasing them posed a risk of reoffending and that grounds cited for bail were baseless. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts