Sunil Gangadhar Dhaneshwar vs The State of Maharashtra — 2648/2022

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 91. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU030135032022

Filing Number

13497/2022

Filing Date

05-Sep-2022

Registration No

2648/2022

Registration Date

06-Sep-2022

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

4-VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

397

Police Station

CIDCO

Year

2022

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 91

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sunil Gangadhar Dhaneshwar

    Adv. Sartale S.P.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The Aurangabad Judicial Magistrate dismissed Sunil Gangadhar Dhaneshwar's application (Cri.M.A. No.2648/2022) filed under CrPC Section 91 seeking preservation of CCTV footage related to crime no.397/2022. The court found that the applicant failed to appear after filing the application, indicating lack of interest in pursuing it. The application was dismissed for non-appearance and want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  6. 13-Nov-2025

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  7. 03-Sep-2025

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  8. 06-Aug-2025

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  9. 09-Jun-2025

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  10. 13-Mar-2025

    Appearance

    VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  11. 07-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  12. 08-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  13. 25-Nov-2024

    Appearance

    VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  14. 18-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  15. 06-Sep-2024

    Appearance

    VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  16. 06-Aug-2024

    Appearance

    VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  17. 29-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  18. 28-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  19. 23-Apr-2024

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  20. 11-Mar-2024

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  21. 01-Feb-2024

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  22. 17-Jan-2024

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  23. 13-Dec-2023

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  24. 11-Oct-2023

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  25. 02-Sep-2023

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  26. 26-Jul-2023

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  27. 05-Jun-2023

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  28. 27-Apr-2023

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  29. 11-Jan-2023

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  30. 25-Nov-2022

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  31. 17-Nov-2022

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  32. 21-Oct-2022

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  33. 13-Oct-2022

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  34. 19-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  35. 12-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 05-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2648/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The Aurangabad Judicial Magistrate dismissed Sunil Gangadhar Dhaneshwar's application (Cri.M.A. No.2648/2022) filed under CrPC Section 91 seeking preservation of CCTV footage related to crime no.397/2022. The court found that the applicant failed to appear after filing the application, indicating lack of interest in pursuing it. The application was dismissed for non-appearance and want of prosecution. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case