Arjun Uttamrao Warade vs The State of Maharashtra — 2479/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 410. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU030129472023

Filing Number

12933/2023

Filing Date

10-Aug-2023

Registration No

2479/2023

Registration Date

11-Aug-2023

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 410

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Arjun Uttamrao Warade

    Adv. Ghanekar N.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The court rejected Arjun Uttamrao Warade's application under Section 410 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to consolidate four separate charge-sheets (arising from different police stations) into a single court proceeding. The Chief Judicial Magistrate held that while the cases involve the same informant and accused, there is no provision in the CrPC to club multiple charge-sheets from different police stations for joint trial, and separate trials would not cause inconvenience to parties or risk conflicting judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    Order on Exh

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  6. 21-Feb-2026

    Order on Exh

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  7. 07-Jan-2026

    Order on Exh

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  8. 04-Oct-2025

    Order on Exh

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  9. 20-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  10. 01-Aug-2025

    Order on Exh

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  11. 01-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  12. 02-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  13. 16-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  14. 03-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  15. 24-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  16. 21-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  17. 21-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  18. 13-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  19. 13-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  20. 06-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  21. 04-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  22. 04-Jan-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  23. 04-Dec-2024

    Order on Exh

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  24. 27-Nov-2024

    Order on Exh

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  25. 21-Oct-2024

    Order on Exh

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  26. 04-Oct-2024

    Order on Exh

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  27. 12-Sep-2024

    Order on Exh

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  28. 30-Aug-2024

    Compliance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  29. 21-Aug-2024

    Compliance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  30. 09-Aug-2024

    Compliance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  31. 07-Aug-2024

    Compliance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  32. 06-Aug-2024

    Order

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  33. 05-Aug-2024

    Order

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  34. 03-Aug-2024

    Order

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  35. 16-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  36. 06-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  37. 06-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  38. 06-Apr-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  39. 26-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  40. 14-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  41. 12-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  42. 27-Feb-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  43. 12-Feb-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  44. 22-Jan-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  45. 06-Jan-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  46. 22-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  47. 18-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  48. 23-Nov-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  49. 06-Nov-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  50. 05-Oct-2023

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  51. 17-Aug-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  52. 10-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2479/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The court rejected Arjun Uttamrao Warade's application under Section 410 of the Criminal Procedure Code seeking to consolidate four separate charge-sheets (arising from different police stations) into a single court proceeding. The Chief Judicial Magistrate held that while the cases involve the same informant and accused, there is no provision in the CrPC to club multiple charge-sheets from different police stations for joint trial, and separate trials would not cause inconvenience to parties or risk conflicting judgments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case