The State of Maharashtra vs Ramesh Santaram Dandge Advocate - Sartale S.P. — 1412/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,34. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 24th July 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 24-Jul-2026

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU030106562018

Filing Number

10654/2018

Filing Date

21-Aug-2018

Registration No

1412/2018

Registration Date

21-Aug-2018

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

105

Police Station

SATARA KHANDOBA

Year

2018

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,34
Maharashtra Prevention of Malpractices at University, Board and Other Specified Examinations Act Section 2,6

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh Santaram Dandge Advocate - Sartale S.P.

  2. 2.Amol Lukdu Wani

    Adv. Wakle S.V.

Case History

  1. 24-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  3. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  4. 15-Apr-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case Summary: RCC 1412/2018 This is a marathon race inquiry case where the State of Maharashtra prosecuted advocates Ramesh Santaram Dandge and Amol Lukdu Wani for alleged improprieties during a 2.5 km marathon race event. A key witness (race organizer) testified regarding DVD evidence showing race footage and photographs identifying the accused allegedly distributing tokens improperly to runners. After extensive examination and cross-examination of the witness on the CCTV footage, chest numbers, and documentary evidence (Indian Evidence Act certificates), the court found the witness's credibility questionable regarding inconsistencies in the identification of accused persons. The petition was dismissed and charges against both accused were found not proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 15-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  6. 04-Apr-2026

    EvidenceView PDF

  7. 04-Apr-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  8. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  9. 04-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  10. 07-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  11. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  12. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  13. 10-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  14. 13-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  15. 18-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  16. 14-May-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  17. 26-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  18. 20-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  19. 30-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  20. 17-Dec-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  21. 13-Nov-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  22. 04-Nov-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  23. 26-Sep-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  24. 12-Aug-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  25. 26-Jul-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  26. 06-Jul-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  27. 18-Jun-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  28. 18-Apr-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  29. 15-Mar-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  30. 17-Feb-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  31. 04-Jan-2024

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  32. 08-Dec-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  33. 19-Aug-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  34. 13-Jul-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  35. 12-Jun-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  36. 15-May-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  37. 26-Apr-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  38. 13-Mar-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  39. 11-Jan-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  40. 05-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  41. 11-Oct-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  42. 05-Sep-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  43. 05-Aug-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  44. 22-Jun-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  45. 16-Apr-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  46. 16-Feb-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  47. 14-Jan-2022

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  48. 22-Nov-2021

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  49. 16-Sep-2021

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  50. 13-Jul-2021

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  51. 04-May-2021

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  52. 19-Mar-2021

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  53. 12-Feb-2021

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  54. 28-Dec-2020

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  55. 05-Oct-2020

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  56. 08-Jul-2020

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  57. 22-May-2020

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  58. 01-Apr-2020

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  59. 25-Feb-2020

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  60. 21-Dec-2019

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  61. 06-Nov-2019

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  62. 24-Sep-2019

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  63. 19-Jul-2019

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  64. 27-May-2019

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  65. 30-Apr-2019

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  66. 16-Mar-2019

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  67. 23-Jan-2019

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  68. 26-Nov-2018

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  69. 21-Sep-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  70. 21-Aug-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1412/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCC 1412/2018 This is a marathon race inquiry case where the State of Maharashtra prosecuted advocates Ramesh Santaram Dandge and Amol Lukdu Wani for alleged improprieties during a 2.5 km marathon race event. A key witness (race organizer) testified regarding DVD evidence showing race footage and photographs identifying the accused allegedly distributing tokens improperly to runners. After extensive examination and cross-examination of the witness on the CCTV footage, chest numbers, and documentary evidence (Indian Evidence Act certificates), the court found the witness's credibility questionable regarding inconsistencies in the identification of accused persons. The petition was dismissed and charges against both accused were found not proven. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case