The State of Maharashtra vs Sominath Bhausaheb Sonwane Advocate - Barate I.C. — 1862/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 420,465,468,471. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 16th July 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 16-Jul-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU030098002021

Filing Number

9797/2021

Filing Date

23-Jul-2021

Registration No

1862/2021

Registration Date

26-Jul-2021

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

Last updated 24-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

468

Police Station

KRANTI CHOWK

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 420,465,468,471
Motor Vehicles Act Section 3(1),181

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sominath Bhausaheb Sonwane Advocate - Barate I.C.

Case History

  1. 16-Jul-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 15-Jun-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  4. 12-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  5. 10-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  6. 18-Aug-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  7. 20-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  8. 16-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  9. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  10. 10-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  11. 14-Nov-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  12. 03-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  13. 07-Aug-2024

    Order on Exhibit

    Summary of Case 1862/2021: The accused's application to recall witness PW1 for cross-examination was allowed. The court granted permission for cross-examination of the informant witness, who had previously testified without cross-examination due to the accused's advocate being absent. The accused was ordered to pay witness Bhatta (fees) as per rules, and witness summons were issued accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 07-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  15. 03-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  16. 09-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  17. 27-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  18. 15-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  19. 09-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  20. 04-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  21. 04-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  22. 20-Jul-2023

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  23. 19-Jun-2023

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  24. 03-Apr-2023

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  25. 04-Jan-2023

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  26. 09-Nov-2022

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  27. 15-Oct-2022

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  28. 07-Sep-2022

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  29. 04-Aug-2022

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  30. 08-Jul-2022

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  31. 04-Jul-2022

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  32. 10-May-2022

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  33. 01-Apr-2022

    Charge

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  34. 01-Jan-2022

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  35. 01-Oct-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  36. 23-Jul-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1862/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 1862/2021: The accused's application to recall witness PW1 for cross-examination was allowed. The court granted permission for cross-examination of the informant witness, who had previously testified without cross-examination due to the accused's advocate being absent. The accused was ordered to pay witness Bhatta (fees) as per rules, and witness summons were issued accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case