Baban Narayan Wahul vs The State of Maharashtra — 903/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 07th May 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU030050032026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

5003/2026

Filing Date

04-03-2026

Registration No

903/2026

Registration Date

04-03-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

2-XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

Decision Date

07th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Baban Narayan Wahul

Adv. Tade G.L.

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 2-XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

07-05-2026

Disposed

06-05-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

04-05-2026

Reply/Say

27-04-2026

Reply/Say

21-04-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

07-05-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed Baban Wahul's application to defreeze Rs. 56,727/- that was frozen across three bank accounts following his online fraud complaint on 21-02-2026. The court granted interim possession of the amount to the applicant upon execution of an indemnity bond, finding prima facie that the amount belonged to him and that no purpose was served by retaining it in police/court custody. The applicant was directed to furnish surety, maintain a minimum balance of Rs. 50,000/-, and re-deposit the amount when required for investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed Baban Wahul's application to defreeze Rs. 56,727/- that was frozen across three bank accounts following his online fraud complaint on 21-02-2026. The court granted interim possession of the amount to the applicant upon execution of an indemnity bond, finding prima facie that the amount belonged to him and that no purpose was served by retaining it in police/court custody. The applicant was directed to furnish surety, maintain a minimum balance of Rs. 50,000/-, and re-deposit the amount when required for investigation and trial. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case