Sachin Madhukar Mule vs Ratan Ashru Pagore — 888/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 499,500. Status: Dismissal Order. Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application
CNR: MHAU030046972023
Filing Number
4687/2023
Filing Date
24-Mar-2023
Registration No
888/2023
Registration Date
27-Mar-2023
Court
Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad
Judge
4-VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
Last updated 29-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sachin Madhukar Mule
Adv. Jadhav N.S.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Ratan Ashru Pagore
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
12-Mar-2026
Dismissal Order
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
16-Feb-2026
Dismissal Order
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
29-Jan-2026
Dismissal Order
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
10-Dec-2025
Dismissal Order
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
28-Nov-2025
Dismissal Order
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
09-Oct-2025
Dismissal Order
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
02-Sep-2025
Dismissal Order
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
29-Aug-2025
Dismissal Order
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
18-Jul-2025
Dismissal Order
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
08-Jul-2025
Dismissal Order
VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
21-Apr-2025
Dismissal Order
V Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
28-Jan-2025
Appearance
XI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
07-Dec-2024
Appearance
XI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
07-Nov-2024
Appearance
XI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
21-Sep-2024
Appearance
XI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
16-Jul-2024
Appearance
X Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
21-May-2024
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 888/2023 Summary: Sachin Madhukar Mule filed a petition under Section 156(3) CrPC seeking to direct Satara Police Station to register an FIR against Ratan Ashru Pagore for defamation and blackmail related to a 13-acre land purchase. The court rejected the direct FIR registration request, finding that while the allegations constitute cognizable offences, the complainant failed to sufficiently establish the accused's intentional conduct through documentary evidence. The court ordered the complainant to examine himself and his witnesses under Section 200 CrPC to substantiate his allegations before proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-May-2024
Appearance
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
06-May-2024
Order on Exh
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
19-Apr-2024
Order on Exh
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
12-Apr-2024
Order on Exh
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
19-Mar-2024
Order on Exh
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
04-Mar-2024
Order on Exh
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
14-Feb-2024
Order on Exh
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
16-Jan-2024
Hearing
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
30-Nov-2023
Hearing
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
08-Nov-2023
Hearing
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
13-Oct-2023
Hearing
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
15-Sep-2023
Hearing
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
17-Aug-2023
Hearing
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
28-Jul-2023
Hearing
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
28-Jun-2023
Hearing
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
15-Jun-2023
Hearing
VIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
15-Apr-2023
Appearance
XII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.
-
01-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 888/2023
Case 888/2023 Summary: Sachin Madhukar Mule filed a petition under Section 156(3) CrPC seeking to direct Satara Police Station to register an FIR against Ratan Ashru Pagore for defamation and blackmail related to a 13-acre land purchase. The court rejected the direct FIR registration request, finding that while the allegations constitute cognizable offences, the complainant failed to sufficiently establish the accused's intentional conduct through documentary evidence. The court ordered the complainant to examine himself and his witnesses under Section 200 CrPC to substantiate his allegations before proceeding further. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts