The State of Maharashtra vs Ayush Sandip Jain Advocate - Khivansara S.S. — 599/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th June 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 10-Jun-2026

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU030032362018

Filing Number

3236/2018

Filing Date

27-Feb-2018

Registration No

599/2018

Registration Date

27-Feb-2018

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

371

Police Station

CITY CHOWK

Year

2017

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 324,323,504,506

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ayush Sandip Jain Advocate - Khivansara S.S.

  2. 2.Sandip Amrutlal Jain

  3. 3.Rakesh Amrutlal Jain

  4. 4.Prashant Deepak Pukhar

Case History

  1. 10-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  3. 15-Jan-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  4. 15-Dec-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  5. 20-Nov-2025

    EvidenceView PDF

    Case 599/2018 Summary In this criminal case before the Aurangabad Chief Judicial Magistrate, a prosecution witness testified regarding alleged procedural irregularities in a seizure/panchnama conducted on 20.10.2017. The witness denied being properly called as a panchas (witness) and claimed not to have actually witnessed the panchnama, though his signature appeared on the document. The defense counsel cross-examined the witness, who maintained inconsistencies regarding the seizure procedure and a small knife allegedly recovered. The court recorded the cross-examination on 20/11/2025, and the defense counsel declined further cross-examination. No substantive order on the merits was issued in this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  6. 20-Nov-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  7. 02-Sep-2025

    N.B.W._Ready

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  8. 10-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  9. 07-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  10. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  11. 17-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  12. 18-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  13. 21-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  14. 06-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  15. 09-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  16. 09-May-2024

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  17. 19-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  18. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  19. 16-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  20. 06-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  21. 16-Sep-2023

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

  22. 16-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  23. 16-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  24. 05-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  25. 04-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  26. 03-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  27. 26-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  28. 24-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  29. 21-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  30. 16-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  31. 01-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  32. 23-Jan-2023

    Evidence

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  33. 18-Jan-2023

    Filing of Say on Exh___Unready

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  34. 03-Jan-2023

    Filing of Surety

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  35. 03-Sep-2022

    Appearance

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  36. 13-Jul-2022

    Appearance

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  37. 13-May-2022

    Appearance

    II Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  38. 14-Feb-2022

    Appearance

    II Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  39. 14-Oct-2021

    Appearance

    II Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  40. 14-Jun-2021

    Appearance

    II Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  41. 23-Apr-2021

    Appearance

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  42. 10-Nov-2020

    Appearance

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  43. 25-Jun-2020

    Appearance

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  44. 04-Jun-2020

    Appearance

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  45. 13-May-2020

    Appearance

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  46. 18-Apr-2020

    Appearance

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  47. 13-Jan-2020

    Appearance

    III Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  48. 09-Oct-2019

    Appearance

    IV Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  49. 09-Aug-2019

    Appearance

    IV Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  50. 27-May-2019

    Appearance

    IV Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  51. 20-Mar-2019

    Appearance

    IV Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  52. 06-Dec-2018

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  53. 03-Oct-2018

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  54. 27-Mar-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 27-Feb-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. 599/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case 599/2018 Summary In this criminal case before the Aurangabad Chief Judicial Magistrate, a prosecution witness testified regarding alleged procedural irregularities in a seizure/panchnama conducted on 20.10.2017. The witness denied being properly called as a panchas (witness) and claimed not to have actually witnessed the panchnama, though his signature appeared on the document. The defense counsel cross-examined the witness, who maintained inconsistencies regarding the seizure procedure and a small knife allegedly recovered. The court recorded the cross-examination on 20/11/2025, and the defense counsel declined further cross-examination. No substantive order on the merits was issued in this interim hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case