Dilip Sitaram Danekar vs The State of Maharashtra — 632/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 30th March 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU030030722026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

3072/2026

Filing Date

09-02-2026

Registration No

632/2026

Registration Date

09-02-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

5-XII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Dilip Sitaram Danekar

Adv. Tade G.L.

Respondent(s)

The State of Maharashtra

Hearing History

Judge: 5-XII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

30-03-2026

Disposed

27-03-2026

Reply/Say

16-03-2026

Reply/Say

13-03-2026

Reply/Say

12-03-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: 632/2026 - Dilip Sitaram Danekar v. State of Maharashtra The petitioner sought return of a seizure bond for Rs. 1,59,500/- after falling victim to an online investment fraud scheme via mobile and Telegram. The court granted the petition, ordering the return of Rs. 69,030/- (recovered amount) to the petitioner's Central Bank of India account after execution of a bond, with conditions for future release of the remaining seized amount once the criminal case concludes. The court also directed police to attach the order to case records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 632/2026 - Dilip Sitaram Danekar v. State of Maharashtra The petitioner sought return of a seizure bond for Rs. 1,59,500/- after falling victim to an online investment fraud scheme via mobile and Telegram. The court granted the petition, ordering the return of Rs. 69,030/- (recovered amount) to the petitioner's Central Bank of India account after execution of a bond, with conditions for future release of the remaining seized amount once the criminal case concludes. The court also directed police to attach the order to case records. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case