Sangita Prakash Chaudhari vs Sagar Rajkumar Barwal — 538/2023

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 156(3). Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISSED on 07th May 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU030026022023

Filing Number

2598/2023

Filing Date

10-Feb-2023

Registration No

538/2023

Registration Date

13-Feb-2023

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

24-VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

Decision Date

07-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISSED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Criminal Procedure Section 156(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Sangita Prakash Chaudhari

    Adv. Jadhav R.B.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sagar Rajkumar Barwal

  2. 2.Rajkumar Barwal

  3. 3.Sunita Rajkumar Barwal

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Criminal Application No. 538/2023 was dismissed in default by the 7th Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad on May 7, 2026. Petitioner Sangita Prakash Chaudhari and her counsel were repeatedly absent from court proceedings over a considerable duration, including on the dismissal date when they were called until 5:30 p.m., demonstrating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-May-2026

    Disposed

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  4. 29-Apr-2026

    Dismissal Order

    VII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Dismissal Order

    XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Dismissal Order

    XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  7. 16-Jan-2026

    Dismissal Order

    XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  8. 08-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  9. 23-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  10. 06-May-2025

    Appearance

    XVI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  11. 01-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    XXI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  12. 01-Feb-2025

    Appearance

    XXII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  13. 01-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    XXII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  14. 21-Aug-2024

    Appearance

    XXII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  15. 21-Jun-2024

    Appearance

    XXI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  16. 19-Apr-2024

    Appearance

    XXI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  17. 26-Mar-2024

    Appearance

    XXI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  18. 12-Mar-2024

    Appearance

    XXI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  19. 12-Feb-2024

    Appearance

    XXI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  20. 30-Jan-2024

    Appearance

    XXI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  21. 20-Jan-2024

    Appearance

    XXII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  22. 13-Dec-2023

    Appearance

    XXII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  23. 21-Sep-2023

    Appearance

    XXII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  24. 05-Sep-2023

    Appearance

    XXII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  25. 10-Aug-2023

    Appearance

    XXII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  26. 06-Jul-2023

    Appearance

    XXII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  27. 17-Jun-2023

    Appearance

    XXII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  28. 27-Apr-2023

    Appearance

    XX Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  29. 18-Mar-2023

    Appearance

    XVI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  30. 04-Mar-2023

    Appearance

    XVI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  31. 23-Feb-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  32. 10-Feb-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 538/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Criminal Application No. 538/2023 was dismissed in default by the 7th Judicial Magistrate, Aurangabad on May 7, 2026. Petitioner Sangita Prakash Chaudhari and her counsel were repeatedly absent from court proceedings over a considerable duration, including on the dismissal date when they were called until 5:30 p.m., demonstrating a lack of interest in pursuing the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case