Salman Liyakatkha Pathan vs Shaikh Riyaz Gulam Rabbani — 484/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 27th April 2026.

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU030022942026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

28-01-2026

Filing Number

2294/2026

Filing Date

29-01-2026

Registration No

484/2026

Registration Date

30-01-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

6-Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate No 5 Abad

Decision Date

27th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138

Petitioner(s)

Salman Liyakatkha Pathan

Adv. DESHPANDE ANAND SUDHIR

Respondent(s)

Shaikh Riyaz Gulam Rabbani

Hearing History

Judge: 6-Addl Chief Judicial Magistrate No 5 Abad

27-04-2026

Disposed

16-04-2026

Order

12-03-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

23-02-2026

Argument on Exh.____Unready

05-02-2026

Compliance

Final Orders / Judgements

27-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

The court allowed the petitioner Salman Pathan's application for condonation of delay under Section 142(b) of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 in filing a complaint against respondent Shaikh Riyaz for dishonor of a cheque worth Rs. 5,77,57,103. The court found the 2-day delay justified due to economic hardship preventing timely payment of court fees, and determined that permitting the delay would cause no prejudice to the accused while rejection would cause irreparable loss to the complainant. The complaint was directed to be registered with a new number. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the petitioner Salman Pathan's application for condonation of delay under Section 142(b) of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881 in filing a complaint against respondent Shaikh Riyaz for dishonor of a cheque worth Rs. 5,77,57,103. The court found the 2-day delay justified due to economic hardship preventing timely payment of court fees, and determined that permitting the delay would cause no prejudice to the accused while rejection would cause irreparable loss to the complainant. The complaint was directed to be registered with a new number. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case