The State of Maharashtra vs Shaikh Nadim Shaikh Umar — 1240/2024

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 130(1)/177. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Summons/Summary Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU030019992024

Filing Number

1996/2024

Filing Date

24-Jan-2024

Registration No

1240/2024

Registration Date

24-Jan-2024

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

4-VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 130(1)/177

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shaikh Nadim Shaikh Umar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    Order on Exhibit

    The court stopped proceedings against accused Shaikh Nadim Shaikh Umar under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code because the prosecution failed to secure his presence in court. The accused, charged under Sections 130(1)/177 of the Motor Vehicles Act, was discharged and his bail bonds were canceled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  5. 16-Oct-2025

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  6. 23-Jul-2025

    Appearance

    VI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  7. 17-Apr-2025

    Appearance

    V Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  8. 14-Jan-2025

    Appearance

    XI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  9. 16-Oct-2024

    Appearance

    XI Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  10. 04-Jul-2024

    Appearance

    X Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  11. 28-Mar-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  12. 24-Jan-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1240/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court stopped proceedings against accused Shaikh Nadim Shaikh Umar under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code because the prosecution failed to secure his presence in court. The accused, charged under Sections 130(1)/177 of the Motor Vehicles Act, was discharged and his bail bonds were canceled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case