MS Sai Yog Agencies Through Proprietor Urmila Subhash Thorat vs Central Bank Of India Through Branch Manager Advocate - Navhate V.E. — 173/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 450. Disposed: Uncontested--REJECTED on 17th April 2026.

Case disposed

Cri.M.A. - Criminal Misc. Application

CNR: MHAU030012172026

e-Filing Number

09-01-2026

Filing Number

1217/2026

Filing Date

16-Jan-2026

Registration No

173/2026

Registration Date

16-Jan-2026

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

1-Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

Decision Date

17-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REJECTED

Last updated 29-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 450

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MS Sai Yog Agencies Through Proprietor Urmila Subhash Thorat

    Adv. Shere Patil D.S.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Central Bank Of India Through Branch Manager Advocate - Navhate V.E.

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Apr-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: The court rejected Ms. Sai Yog Agencies' application under Section 450 of BNSS 2023 to transfer a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint (SCC No.22370/2024) from the 6th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Aurangabad to another court. The applicant claimed bias and injustice, alleging the judge was forcing proceedings and that settlement was preferable; however, the court found her claims unsubstantiated, noting she appeared only after a warrant was issued and had not genuinely pursued mediation or Lok Adalat despite claiming settlement intent. The application was dismissed as lacking merit and appearing designed to delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  4. 20-Mar-2026

    Order

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  5. 16-Mar-2026

    Order

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  6. 12-Mar-2026

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  7. 03-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    Chief Judicial Magistrate Aurangabad.

  8. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 16-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 173/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The court rejected Ms. Sai Yog Agencies' application under Section 450 of BNSS 2023 to transfer a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint (SCC No.22370/2024) from the 6th Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Aurangabad to another court. The applicant claimed bias and injustice, alleging the judge was forcing proceedings and that settlement was preferable; however, the court found her claims unsubstantiated, noting she appeared only after a warrant was issued and had not genuinely pursued mediation or Lok Adalat despite claiming settlement intent. The application was dismissed as lacking merit and appearing designed to delay proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case