The State of Maharashtra vs Dattatraya Subhash Khomne — 264/2021

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),323,504,506,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.C. - Regular Criminal Case

CNR: MHAU030008312021

Filing Number

831/2021

Filing Date

13-Jan-2021

Registration No

264/2021

Registration Date

13-Jan-2021

Court

Chief Judicial Magistrate , Aurangabad

Judge

2-XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ACQUITTED

Last updated 29-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

42

Police Station

MIDC WALUJ

Year

2020

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 498(A),323,504,506,34
Dowry Prohibition Act Section 3,4

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State of Maharashtra

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dattatraya Subhash Khomne

  2. 2.Subhash Haribhau Khomne

  3. 3.Indubai Subhash Khomne

  4. 4.Mangesh Ashok Chorge

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Dattatraya Subhash Khomne & Others (Case 264/2021) Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Dattatraya Subhash Khomne, Subhash Haribhau Khomne, Indubai Subhash Khomne, and Mangesh Ashok Chorge) of charges under IPC sections 498-A (cruelty to spouse), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (intentional insult), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 34 (common intention). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case that the accused demanded dowry and subjected the complainant to physical and mental harassment. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant alleged the accused demanded a car as dowry and harassed her, she retracted these allegations in her testimony before the court. The prosecution failed to produce corroborating evidence beyond the complainant's statement, and her oral testimony contradicted her original complaint. The court noted the dispute appeared to be a domestic family matter resolved outside court rather than a criminal offense substantiated by proper evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Arguments

    XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Appearance

    XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  6. 03-Jan-2026

    Appearance

    XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  7. 09-Dec-2025

    Appearance

    XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  8. 10-Sep-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  9. 18-Jul-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    XIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  10. 28-Mar-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    XVIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  11. 26-Dec-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    XIX Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  12. 07-Oct-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    XIX Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  13. 23-Jul-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    XIX Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  14. 18-May-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    XVIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  15. 06-Mar-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    XVIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  16. 02-Jan-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    XIX Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  17. 08-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    XIX Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  18. 05-Sep-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    XIX Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  19. 16-Jun-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    XIX Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  20. 23-Feb-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    XVII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  21. 09-Nov-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    XVII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  22. 16-Jun-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    XVII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  23. 16-Apr-2022

    Awaiting Summons

    XVII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  24. 29-Nov-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    XVII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  25. 27-Aug-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    XVIII Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  26. 28-May-2021

    Awaiting Summons

    XX Judicial Magistrate F.C. Abad.

  27. 19-Mar-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 13-Jan-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 264/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Maharashtra v. Dattatraya Subhash Khomne & Others (Case 264/2021) Court Decision: The court acquitted all four accused (Dattatraya Subhash Khomne, Subhash Haribhau Khomne, Indubai Subhash Khomne, and Mangesh Ashok Chorge) of charges under IPC sections 498-A (cruelty to spouse), 323 (voluntarily causing hurt), 504 (intentional insult), 506 (criminal intimidation), and 34 (common intention). The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's case that the accused demanded dowry and subjected the complainant to physical and mental harassment. Key Reasoning: Although the complainant alleged the accused demanded a car as dowry and harassed her, she retracted these allegations in her testimony before the court. The prosecution failed to produce corroborating evidence beyond the complainant's statement, and her oral testimony contradicted her original complaint. The court noted the dispute appeared to be a domestic family matter resolved outside court rather than a criminal offense substantiated by proper evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case