Dattatray Sansthan Mandir Shaniwar Peth Warud through Arun Gulabrao Pohane vs Chandrakala Dnyaneshwar Solanki — 44/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Contested--DECREED on 21st May 2026.

Case disposed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAM180017262021

Filing Number

668/2021

Filing Date

28-Jun-2021

Registration No

44/2021

Registration Date

28-Jun-2021

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Warud

Judge

46-Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

Decision Date

21-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DECREED

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Dattatray Sansthan Mandir Shaniwar Peth Warud through Arun Gulabrao Pohane

    Adv. Ghatole A.R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chandrakala Dnyaneshwar Solanki

  2. 2.Arun Dnyaneshwar Solanki

  3. 3.Uma Arun Solanki

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 21-May-2026

    Copy of JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: 44/2021 Court Decision: The court ruled in favor of the petitioner (Dattatray Sansthan Mandir) and issued a mandatory injunction prohibiting the respondents from conducting any construction on the disputed property. The court ordered immediate demolition of all unauthorized structures (raw room, well, toilet, and passage) erected by the respondents on the temple's land, and directed the respondents to cease all further construction activities on the property. Key Reasoning: Based on documentary evidence (ownership deed, tax records, 7/12 extract) and consistent testimony from three witnesses, the court found that the petitioner institution legally owns and possesses the disputed property. The respondents unlawfully commenced construction without authorization, thereby creating obstruction for devotees visiting the temple and violating the petitioner's ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 21-May-2026

    Disposed

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  4. 08-May-2026

    Judgment

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  5. 28-Apr-2026

    Judgment

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  6. 08-Apr-2026

    Citation

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  7. 20-Mar-2026

    Citation

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  8. 24-Feb-2026

    Citation

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  9. 07-Feb-2026

    Citation

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  10. 21-Jan-2026

    Citation

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  11. 09-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  12. 20-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  13. 03-Dec-2025

    Arguments

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  14. 17-Nov-2025

    Arguments

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  15. 20-Sep-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  16. 28-Jul-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  17. 23-Jun-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  18. 07-Apr-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  19. 10-Feb-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  20. 09-Jan-2025

    Defence Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  21. 07-Nov-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  22. 23-Sep-2024

    Defence Evidence

    Jt Civil Judge J.D JMFC Warud

  23. 24-Jun-2024

    Steps

    2nd Jt. C.J.J.D. J.M.F.C. Warud

  24. 20-Apr-2024

    Evidence

  25. 13-Mar-2024

    Evidence

  26. 08-Feb-2024

    Evidence

  27. 08-Dec-2023

    Evidence

  28. 25-Oct-2023

    Evidence

  29. 16-Sep-2023

    Evidence

  30. 02-Aug-2023

    Evidence

  31. 28-Jul-2023

    Evidence

  32. 01-Jul-2023

    Evidence

  33. 08-Jun-2023

    Evidence

  34. 10-Apr-2023

    Evidence

  35. 14-Mar-2023

    Evidence

  36. 15-Feb-2023

    Evidence

  37. 18-Jan-2023

    Evidence

  38. 17-Dec-2022

    Evidence

  39. 22-Nov-2022

    Evidence

  40. 19-Oct-2022

    Evidence

  41. 20-Sep-2022

    Evidence

  42. 18-Aug-2022

    Evidence

  43. 14-Jul-2022

    Evidence

  44. 16-Jun-2022

    Evidence

  45. 04-May-2022

    Evidence

  46. 13-Apr-2022

    Evidence

  47. 21-Mar-2022

    Evidence

  48. 14-Feb-2022

    Evidence

  49. 13-Jan-2022

    Evidence

  50. 14-Dec-2021

    Evidence

  51. 15-Nov-2021

    Evidence

  52. 26-Oct-2021

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  53. 26-Oct-2021

    Evidence

  54. 22-Oct-2021

    Hearing

  55. 13-Oct-2021

    Hearing

  56. 11-Oct-2021

    Hearing

  57. 15-Sep-2021

    Hearing

  58. 30-Aug-2021

    Hearing

  59. 24-Aug-2021

    Hearing

  60. 05-Aug-2021

    Report

  61. 27-Jul-2021

    Report

  62. 19-Jul-2021

    Report

  63. 05-Jul-2021

    Report

  64. 28-Jun-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  65. 28-Jun-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2021

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 44/2021 Court Decision: The court ruled in favor of the petitioner (Dattatray Sansthan Mandir) and issued a mandatory injunction prohibiting the respondents from conducting any construction on the disputed property. The court ordered immediate demolition of all unauthorized structures (raw room, well, toilet, and passage) erected by the respondents on the temple's land, and directed the respondents to cease all further construction activities on the property. Key Reasoning: Based on documentary evidence (ownership deed, tax records, 7/12 extract) and consistent testimony from three witnesses, the court found that the petitioner institution legally owns and possesses the disputed property. The respondents unlawfully commenced construction without authorization, thereby creating obstruction for devotees visiting the temple and violating the petitioner's ownership rights. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case