Bhavana Shashikant Sangai And Other vs Nil — 117/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

M.J.Cases

CNR: MHAM070003742026

e-Filing Number

20-02-2026

Filing Number

135/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

117/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division, Anjangaon Surji

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr. Dn., Anjangaon Surji

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 25-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhavana Shashikant Sangai And Other

    Adv. R. A. Pendhari

  2. 2.Vikas Shashikant Sangai

    Adv. R. A. Pendhari

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The court approved the petitioners' application for a succession certificate, recognizing Bhavana Sangai (wife) and Vikas Sangai (son) as the sole legal heirs of the deceased Shashikant Bapu Sangai, who died on 06/01/2026. The court found the evidence submitted—death certificate, Aadhar cards, property documents, and witness affidavits—sufficient to establish their heirship, with no objections filed during the public notice period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jun-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn., Anjangaon Surji

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Civil Judge Jr. Dn., Anjangaon Surji

  5. 20-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 117/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court approved the petitioners' application for a succession certificate, recognizing Bhavana Sangai (wife) and Vikas Sangai (son) as the sole legal heirs of the deceased Shashikant Bapu Sangai, who died on 06/01/2026. The court found the evidence submitted—death certificate, Aadhar cards, property documents, and witness affidavits—sufficient to establish their heirship, with no objections filed during the public notice period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case