Balakram Manik Zara vs Rukhmabai Babulal Chatur — 50/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAK110015252023

Reply/Say

Next Hearing

24th April 2026

e-Filing Number

10-11-2023

Filing Number

386/2023

Filing Date

10-11-2023

Registration No

50/2023

Registration Date

10-11-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Telhara

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

Balakram Manik Zara

Adv. Chaumwal R.C

Shalikram Manik Zara

Adv. Chaumwal R.C

Banu Kashiram Dhande

Adv. Chaumwal R.C

Respondent(s)

Rukhmabai Babulal Chatur

Branch Officer Axis Bank Akot

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

06-03-2026

Reply/Say

13-02-2026

Reply/Say

19-01-2026

Reply/Say

16-01-2026

Order

23-12-2025

Order

Interim Orders

29-12-2023
Order on T.I.

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction restraining defendant no.1 from withdrawing Rs. 41 lakh in compensation awarded to a deceased testatrix. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, noting the challenged Will was registered with presumptive value, supported by medical certification of testator's mental fitness, and most of the disputed amount had already been released to defendant no.1 (only Rs. 280 remaining). The court also held that plaintiffs' failure to claim relief for their own inheritance rights made the suit defective, and costs were imposed on the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction restraining defendant no.1 from withdrawing Rs. 41 lakh in compensation awarded to a deceased testatrix. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, noting the challenged Will was registered with presumptive value, supported by medical certification of testator's mental fitness, and most of the disputed amount had already been released to defendant no.1 (only Rs. 280 remaining). The court also held that plaintiffs' failure to claim relief for their own inheritance rights made the suit defective, and costs were imposed on the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Telhara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case