Balakram Manik Zara vs Rukhmabai Babulal Chatur — 50/2023
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAK110015252023
Next Hearing
24th April 2026
e-Filing Number
10-11-2023
Filing Number
386/2023
Filing Date
10-11-2023
Registration No
50/2023
Registration Date
10-11-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Telhara
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Balakram Manik Zara
Adv. Chaumwal R.C
Shalikram Manik Zara
Adv. Chaumwal R.C
Banu Kashiram Dhande
Adv. Chaumwal R.C
Respondent(s)
Rukhmabai Babulal Chatur
Branch Officer Axis Bank Akot
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Order
Order
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 13-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 19-01-2026 | Reply/Say |
| 16-01-2026 | Order |
| 23-12-2025 | Order |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction restraining defendant no.1 from withdrawing Rs. 41 lakh in compensation awarded to a deceased testatrix. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, noting the challenged Will was registered with presumptive value, supported by medical certification of testator's mental fitness, and most of the disputed amount had already been released to defendant no.1 (only Rs. 280 remaining). The court also held that plaintiffs' failure to claim relief for their own inheritance rights made the suit defective, and costs were imposed on the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction restraining defendant no.1 from withdrawing Rs. 41 lakh in compensation awarded to a deceased testatrix. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, noting the challenged Will was registered with presumptive value, supported by medical certification of testator's mental fitness, and most of the disputed amount had already been released to defendant no.1 (only Rs. 280 remaining). The court also held that plaintiffs' failure to claim relief for their own inheritance rights made the suit defective, and costs were imposed on the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts