Balakram Manik Zara vs Rukhmabai Babulal Chatur — 50/2023

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 34. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 24th April 2026.

Reply/Say Next hearing 24-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAK110015252023

e-Filing Number

10-11-2023

Filing Number

386/2023

Filing Date

10-Nov-2023

Registration No

50/2023

Registration Date

10-Nov-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Telhara

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Balakram Manik Zara

    Adv. Chaumwal R.C

  2. 2.Shalikram Manik Zara

    Adv. Chaumwal R.C

  3. 3.Banu Kashiram Dhande

    Adv. Chaumwal R.C

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rukhmabai Babulal Chatur

  2. 2.Branch Officer Axis Bank Akot

Case History

  1. 24-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Reply/Say

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  5. 16-Jan-2026

    Order

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  6. 23-Dec-2025

    Order

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  7. 24-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  8. 04-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  9. 19-Sep-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  10. 08-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  11. 20-Jun-2025

    Steps

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  12. 11-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  13. 17-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  14. 17-Feb-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  15. 27-Jan-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  16. 01-Jan-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  17. 04-Dec-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  18. 19-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  19. 20-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  20. 29-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  21. 30-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  22. 03-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  23. 11-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  24. 29-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  25. 01-Mar-2024

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  26. 03-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  27. 29-Dec-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction restraining defendant no.1 from withdrawing Rs. 41 lakh in compensation awarded to a deceased testatrix. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, noting the challenged Will was registered with presumptive value, supported by medical certification of testator's mental fitness, and most of the disputed amount had already been released to defendant no.1 (only Rs. 280 remaining). The court also held that plaintiffs' failure to claim relief for their own inheritance rights made the suit defective, and costs were imposed on the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  28. 29-Dec-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  29. 22-Dec-2023

    Order

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  30. 15-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  31. 08-Dec-2023

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  32. 27-Nov-2023

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  33. 20-Nov-2023

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  34. 10-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 10-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 50/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court rejected the plaintiffs' application for temporary injunction restraining defendant no.1 from withdrawing Rs. 41 lakh in compensation awarded to a deceased testatrix. The court found the plaintiffs failed to establish a prima-facie case, noting the challenged Will was registered with presumptive value, supported by medical certification of testator's mental fitness, and most of the disputed amount had already been released to defendant no.1 (only Rs. 280 remaining). The court also held that plaintiffs' failure to claim relief for their own inheritance rights made the suit defective, and costs were imposed on the plaintiffs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case