Mamta Naresh Gupta vs Sunita Niraj Gupta Advocate - Agrawal R.B. — 137/2024

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 383. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Civil M.A.

CNR: MHAK110008372024

Issues

Next Hearing

06th April 2026

e-Filing Number

09-07-2024

Filing Number

196/2024

Filing Date

11-07-2024

Registration No

137/2024

Registration Date

11-07-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Telhara

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 383

Petitioner(s)

Mamta Naresh Gupta

Adv. Kakad A.R.

Yuvraj Naresh Gupta

Adv. Kakad A.R.

Ku Shruti Naresh Gupta

Adv. Kakad A.R.

Respondent(s)

Sunita Niraj Gupta Advocate - Agrawal R.B.

Lalita Shashikant Gupta

Adv. Agrawal R.B.

Jyoti Gajanan Gupta

Adv. Agrawal R.B.

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

06-03-2026

Issues

06-02-2026

Issues

16-01-2026

Issues

22-12-2025

Issues

15-11-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

27-03-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: The Joint Civil Judge rejected the preliminary objection raised by non-applicant no.3 in a petition by Mamta Gupta seeking revocation of a legal heirship certificate granted to Sunita Gupta. The court held that the revocation application is maintainable under Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, since the applicants alleged concealment of material facts amounting to fraud. The court also determined that the limitation issue cannot be dismissed at the preliminary stage, as Section 17 of the Limitation Act applies when fraud is claimed, making the knowledge of fraud the crucial factor in determining the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Joint Civil Judge rejected the preliminary objection raised by non-applicant no.3 in a petition by Mamta Gupta seeking revocation of a legal heirship certificate granted to Sunita Gupta. The court held that the revocation application is maintainable under Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, since the applicants alleged concealment of material facts amounting to fraud. The court also determined that the limitation issue cannot be dismissed at the preliminary stage, as Section 17 of the Limitation Act applies when fraud is claimed, making the knowledge of fraud the crucial factor in determining the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Telhara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case