Mamta Naresh Gupta vs Sunita Niraj Gupta Advocate - Agrawal R.B. — 137/2024

Case under Indian Succession Act Section 383. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 06th April 2026.

Issues Next hearing 06-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Civil M.A.

CNR: MHAK110008372024

e-Filing Number

09-07-2024

Filing Number

196/2024

Filing Date

11-Jul-2024

Registration No

137/2024

Registration Date

11-Jul-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Telhara

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Succession Act Section 383

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mamta Naresh Gupta

    Adv. Kakad A.R.

  2. 2.Yuvraj Naresh Gupta

    Adv. Kakad A.R.

  3. 3.Ku Shruti Naresh Gupta

    Adv. Kakad A.R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sunita Niraj Gupta Advocate - Agrawal R.B.

  2. 2.Lalita Shashikant Gupta

    Adv. Agrawal R.B.

  3. 3.Jyoti Gajanan Gupta

    Adv. Agrawal R.B.

Case History

  1. 06-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  3. 06-Feb-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  4. 16-Jan-2026

    Issues

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  5. 22-Dec-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  6. 15-Nov-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  7. 15-Oct-2025

    Issues

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  8. 28-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  9. 25-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  10. 20-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  11. 24-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  12. 03-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  13. 27-Mar-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: The Joint Civil Judge rejected the preliminary objection raised by non-applicant no.3 in a petition by Mamta Gupta seeking revocation of a legal heirship certificate granted to Sunita Gupta. The court held that the revocation application is maintainable under Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, since the applicants alleged concealment of material facts amounting to fraud. The court also determined that the limitation issue cannot be dismissed at the preliminary stage, as Section 17 of the Limitation Act applies when fraud is claimed, making the knowledge of fraud the crucial factor in determining the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  14. 27-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  15. 13-Mar-2025

    Order

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  16. 06-Mar-2025

    Order

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  17. 13-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  18. 06-Feb-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  19. 09-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  20. 10-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  21. 28-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  22. 12-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  23. 30-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  24. 06-Sep-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  25. 26-Aug-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  26. 14-Aug-2024

    W.S. and Say

    Jt. Civil Judge Jr.Dn.Telhara

  27. 11-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 11-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 137/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The Joint Civil Judge rejected the preliminary objection raised by non-applicant no.3 in a petition by Mamta Gupta seeking revocation of a legal heirship certificate granted to Sunita Gupta. The court held that the revocation application is maintainable under Section 383 of the Indian Succession Act, 1925, since the applicants alleged concealment of material facts amounting to fraud. The court also determined that the limitation issue cannot be dismissed at the preliminary stage, as Section 17 of the Limitation Act applies when fraud is claimed, making the knowledge of fraud the crucial factor in determining the limitation period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case