Manoj Wasudeo Khopale vs Gajanan Ganpat Solanke Advocate - Jawanjal V.W. — 13/2025
Case under Specific Relief Act Section 6. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAK110004072025
Next Hearing
21st April 2026
e-Filing Number
24-02-2025
Filing Number
86/2025
Filing Date
24-02-2025
Registration No
13/2025
Registration Date
24-02-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Telhara
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Manoj Wasudeo Khopale
Adv. Kukade S.N.
Rohit Gopal Khopale
Adv. Kukade S.N.
Respondent(s)
Gajanan Ganpat Solanke Advocate - Jawanjal V.W.
Paryanibai Gajanan Solanke
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
Issues
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Issues |
| 06-03-2026 | Issues |
| 19-01-2026 | Issues |
| 27-11-2025 | Issues |
| 06-10-2025 | Issues |
Interim Orders
Case Summary Case: Manoj v. Gajanan (Civil Case No. 13/2025, MHAK110004072025) Court: Civil Judge, Telangara, Maharashtra Date: 11.08.2025 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court granted an interim injunction (temporary restraining order) against the defendants, prohibiting them from creating a new path through the plaintiff's property or obstructing access from the north boundary of the plaintiff's field until final judgment in the case. The defendants are restrained from harvesting crops using the route authorized by the Naib Tehsildar's order dated 07.10.2024, which the court found legally questionable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary Case: Manoj v. Gajanan (Civil Case No. 13/2025, MHAK110004072025) Court: Civil Judge, Telangara, Maharashtra Date: 11.08.2025 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court granted an interim injunction (temporary restraining order) against the defendants, prohibiting them from creating a new path through the plaintiff's property or obstructing access from the north boundary of the plaintiff's field until final judgment in the case. The defendants are restrained from harvesting crops using the route authorized by the Naib Tehsildar's order dated 07.10.2024, which the court found legally questionable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts