Manoj Wasudeo Khopale vs Gajanan Ganpat Solanke Advocate - Jawanjal V.W. — 13/2025

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 6. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 21st April 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAK110004072025

Issues

Next Hearing

21st April 2026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2025

Filing Number

86/2025

Filing Date

24-02-2025

Registration No

13/2025

Registration Date

24-02-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Telhara

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 6

Petitioner(s)

Manoj Wasudeo Khopale

Adv. Kukade S.N.

Rohit Gopal Khopale

Adv. Kukade S.N.

Respondent(s)

Gajanan Ganpat Solanke Advocate - Jawanjal V.W.

Paryanibai Gajanan Solanke

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

14-03-2026

Issues

06-03-2026

Issues

19-01-2026

Issues

27-11-2025

Issues

06-10-2025

Issues

Interim Orders

11-08-2025
Order on T.I.

Case Summary Case: Manoj v. Gajanan (Civil Case No. 13/2025, MHAK110004072025) Court: Civil Judge, Telangara, Maharashtra Date: 11.08.2025 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court granted an interim injunction (temporary restraining order) against the defendants, prohibiting them from creating a new path through the plaintiff's property or obstructing access from the north boundary of the plaintiff's field until final judgment in the case. The defendants are restrained from harvesting crops using the route authorized by the Naib Tehsildar's order dated 07.10.2024, which the court found legally questionable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Case: Manoj v. Gajanan (Civil Case No. 13/2025, MHAK110004072025) Court: Civil Judge, Telangara, Maharashtra Date: 11.08.2025 Outcome: The petition was allowed. The court granted an interim injunction (temporary restraining order) against the defendants, prohibiting them from creating a new path through the plaintiff's property or obstructing access from the north boundary of the plaintiff's field until final judgment in the case. The defendants are restrained from harvesting crops using the route authorized by the Naib Tehsildar's order dated 07.10.2024, which the court found legally questionable. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Telhara All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case