Salunkabai Motiram Rande vs Nil — 12/2026

Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2,3. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

Civil M.A.

CNR: MHAK110000472026

e-Filing Number

31-12-2025

Filing Number

23/2026

Filing Date

06-Jan-2026

Registration No

12/2026

Registration Date

06-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Telhara

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED / GRANTED AFTER FULL HEARING

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2,3

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Salunkabai Motiram Rande

    Adv. Tayde S.T.

  2. 2.Rajendra Motiram Rande

    Adv. Tayde S.T.

  3. 3.Vinod Motiram Rande

    Adv. Tayde S.T.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Nil

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The Telhara Civil Court granted the petition and declared the three applicants as legal heirs of the deceased Motiram Ganpat Rende (who died on 22.03.2024), directing issuance of a succession certificate as per the Bombay Regulation Act, Section 2. The court found that the applicants had established their status as legitimate heirs through death certificate evidence and affidavits, with no objections filed by any other claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  4. 06-Mar-2026

    Order

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  5. 26-Feb-2026

    Order

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Documents

    Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara

  7. 06-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 06-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 12/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Telhara Civil Court granted the petition and declared the three applicants as legal heirs of the deceased Motiram Ganpat Rende (who died on 22.03.2024), directing issuance of a succession certificate as per the Bombay Regulation Act, Section 2. The court found that the applicants had established their status as legitimate heirs through death certificate evidence and affidavits, with no objections filed by any other claimants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case