Yogesh Haribhau Tiwhane vs Arun / Gajanan Damodar Nirmal Advocate - Tatte S. S. — 1/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section ORule39. Status: Stayed U./S. 10 of CPC. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAK110000122023
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
4/2023
Filing Date
03-01-2023
Registration No
1/2023
Registration Date
03-01-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Telhara
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Yogesh Haribhau Tiwhane
Adv. Bhakare D.K.
Respondent(s)
Arun / Gajanan Damodar Nirmal Advocate - Tatte S. S.
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr.Dn. Telhara
Stayed U./S. 10 of CPC
Stayed U./S. 10 of CPC
Stayed U./S. 10 of CPC
Stayed U./S. 10 of CPC
Stayed U./S. 10 of CPC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Stayed U./S. 10 of CPC |
| 19-01-2026 | Stayed U./S. 10 of CPC |
| 19-11-2025 | Stayed U./S. 10 of CPC |
| 13-10-2025 | Stayed U./S. 10 of CPC |
| 13-08-2025 | Stayed U./S. 10 of CPC |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court rejected the plaintiff's (Arun) application for temporary injunction in RCS 63/2022 seeking specific performance of a 2003 sale agreement for Rs. 21,000 and allowed the defendant's (Yogesh) application for temporary injunction in RCS 01/2023. The court found the defendant retains possession of the property based on assessment records and that the unregistered agreement cannot grant the plaintiff possession rights. The plaintiff is restrained from disturbing the defendant's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court rejected the plaintiff's (Arun) application for temporary injunction in RCS 63/2022 seeking specific performance of a 2003 sale agreement for Rs. 21,000 and allowed the defendant's (Yogesh) application for temporary injunction in RCS 01/2023. The court found the defendant retains possession of the property based on assessment records and that the unregistered agreement cannot grant the plaintiff possession rights. The plaintiff is restrained from disturbing the defendant's possession. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts