State of Maha. Through Police Station Officer, P.S. Channi vs Mahadeo @ Baluappa Ramkrushna Veer Advocate - Shoeb Salar Mohammad — 79/2018
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,504,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHAK100021032016
Next Hearing
30th May 2026
Filing Number
140/2018
Filing Date
16-02-2018
Registration No
79/2018
Registration Date
16-02-2018
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Patur
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State of Maha. Through Police Station Officer, P.S. Channi
Adv. A.P.P.
Respondent(s)
Mahadeo @ Baluappa Ramkrushna Veer Advocate - Shoeb Salar Mohammad
Hearing History
Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
Evidence Part Heard
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-03-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 06-02-2026 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 18-12-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
| 10-11-2025 | Evidence Part Heard |
Interim Orders
Case Summary In this criminal case (FIR No. 79/2018) from Patur, Akola district, Maharashtra, the court examined testimony regarding an alleged dispute over passage through agricultural land on October 15, 2017. The witness (Amol Ramkrishna Padmane) testified that the accused prevented him from removing his harvesting equipment through the accused's field, and he complied by leaving the equipment there. During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was questioned regarding inconsistencies between his police statement and court testimony. The court accepted the witness testimony and dismissed the petition on March 6, 2026, finding no substantive case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary In this criminal case (FIR No. 79/2018) from Patur, Akola district, Maharashtra, the court examined testimony regarding an alleged dispute over passage through agricultural land on October 15, 2017. The witness (Amol Ramkrishna Padmane) testified that the accused prevented him from removing his harvesting equipment through the accused's field, and he complied by leaving the equipment there. During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was questioned regarding inconsistencies between his police statement and court testimony. The court accepted the witness testimony and dismissed the petition on March 6, 2026, finding no substantive case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts