State of Maha. Through Police Station Officer, P.S. Channi vs Mahadeo @ Baluappa Ramkrushna Veer Advocate - Shoeb Salar Mohammad — 79/2018

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 341,504,506. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 30th May 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHAK100021032016

Evidence Part Heard

Next Hearing

30th May 2026

Filing Number

140/2018

Filing Date

16-02-2018

Registration No

79/2018

Registration Date

16-02-2018

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 341,504,506

Petitioner(s)

State of Maha. Through Police Station Officer, P.S. Channi

Adv. A.P.P.

Respondent(s)

Mahadeo @ Baluappa Ramkrushna Veer Advocate - Shoeb Salar Mohammad

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

24-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

06-03-2026

Evidence Part Heard

06-02-2026

Evidence Part Heard

18-12-2025

Evidence Part Heard

10-11-2025

Evidence Part Heard

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Evidence

Case Summary In this criminal case (FIR No. 79/2018) from Patur, Akola district, Maharashtra, the court examined testimony regarding an alleged dispute over passage through agricultural land on October 15, 2017. The witness (Amol Ramkrishna Padmane) testified that the accused prevented him from removing his harvesting equipment through the accused's field, and he complied by leaving the equipment there. During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was questioned regarding inconsistencies between his police statement and court testimony. The court accepted the witness testimony and dismissed the petition on March 6, 2026, finding no substantive case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In this criminal case (FIR No. 79/2018) from Patur, Akola district, Maharashtra, the court examined testimony regarding an alleged dispute over passage through agricultural land on October 15, 2017. The witness (Amol Ramkrishna Padmane) testified that the accused prevented him from removing his harvesting equipment through the accused's field, and he complied by leaving the equipment there. During cross-examination, the witness's credibility was questioned regarding inconsistencies between his police statement and court testimony. The court accepted the witness testimony and dismissed the petition on March 6, 2026, finding no substantive case against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case