Gajanan so Sidhaji Bochre vs Ramesh so Narayan Andhare Advocate - Mankar Mohan Anandrao — 1000018/2014

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 0. Status: Evidence Part Heard. Next hearing: 10th April 2026.

Evidence Part Heard Next hearing 10-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAK100001512014

Filing Number

1000041/2014

Filing Date

21-Mar-2014

Registration No

1000018/2014

Registration Date

21-Mar-2014

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Patur

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. Patur

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 0

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Gajanan so Sidhaji Bochre

    Adv. Qazi Amjad Ali Sarfaraj Ali

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ramesh so Narayan Andhare Advocate - Mankar Mohan Anandrao

Case History

  1. 10-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  3. 22-Jan-2026

    Amended W.S.

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  4. 05-Dec-2025

    Order on Exh

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  5. 31-Oct-2025

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  6. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  7. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  8. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  9. 04-Apr-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  10. 21-Feb-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

  11. 17-Jan-2025

    Evidence Part Heard

  12. 06-Dec-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  13. 25-Oct-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  14. 20-Sep-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  15. 22-Aug-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  16. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  17. 28-Jun-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  18. 03-May-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  19. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  20. 15-Mar-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  21. 09-Feb-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  22. 12-Jan-2024

    Evidence Part Heard

  23. 07-Dec-2023

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  24. 20-Oct-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  25. 15-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  26. 04-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  27. 23-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  28. 15-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  29. 24-Mar-2023

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  30. 10-Feb-2023

    Dismissal Order

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  31. 05-Jan-2023

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  32. 29-Nov-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  33. 14-Oct-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  34. 02-Sep-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  35. 25-Jul-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

  36. 10-Jun-2022

    Evidence Part Heard

  37. 07-May-2022

    Evidence

  38. 25-Mar-2022

    Evidence

  39. 18-Feb-2022

    Evidence

  40. 21-Jan-2022

    Evidence

  41. 11-Dec-2021

    Evidence

  42. 10-Dec-2021

    Evidence

  43. 13-Nov-2021

    Evidence

  44. 29-Oct-2021

    Evidence

  45. 01-Oct-2021

    Evidence

  46. 03-Sep-2021

    Evidence

  47. 24-Aug-2021

    Evidence

  48. 30-Jul-2021

    Evidence

  49. 24-Jun-2021

    Evidence

  50. 07-May-2021

    Evidence

  51. 09-Apr-2021

    Evidence

  52. 12-Mar-2021

    Evidence

  53. 25-Feb-2021

    Evidence

  54. 18-Feb-2021

    Evidence

  55. 29-Jan-2021

    Evidence

  56. 30-Dec-2020

    Evidence

  57. 06-Nov-2020

    Evidence

  58. 04-Sep-2020

    Evidence

  59. 03-Aug-2020

    Evidence

  60. 03-Jul-2020

    Evidence

  61. 17-Apr-2020

    Evidence

  62. 12-Mar-2020

    Evidence

  63. 06-Mar-2020

    Evidence

  64. 24-Feb-2020

    Evidence

  65. 21-Feb-2020

    Evidence

  66. 17-Jan-2020

    Evidence

  67. 20-Dec-2019

    Evidence

  68. 29-Nov-2019

    Evidence

  69. 24-Oct-2019

    Evidence

  70. 20-Sep-2019

    Evidence

  71. 22-Aug-2019

    Evidence

  72. 28-Jun-2019

    Evidence

  73. 18-Jun-2019

    Evidence

  74. 20-Apr-2019

    Evidence

  75. 18-Apr-2019

    Evidence

  76. 15-Mar-2019

    Evidence

  77. 17-Jan-2019

    Evidence

  78. 15-Nov-2018

    Evidence

  79. 12-Oct-2018

    Evidence

  80. 10-Aug-2018

    Evidence

  81. 28-Jun-2018

    Evidence

  82. 06-Apr-2018

    Evidence

  83. 08-Feb-2018

    Evidence

  84. 06-Jan-2018

    Evidence

  85. 16-Dec-2017

    Evidence

  86. 08-Dec-2017

    Evidence

  87. 18-Nov-2017

    Evidence

  88. 22-Sep-2017

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application (Exh.19) to amend the written statement under CPC Order 6 Rule 17, permitting clarification of the property boundary description from the southern side. The court found the amendment was just, reasonable, would assist in determining the real question in controversy, and would not change the nature of the suit. The defendant was directed to carry out the amendment by the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  89. 22-Sep-2017

    Evidence

  90. 08-Sep-2017

    Evidence

  91. 04-Aug-2017

    Evidence

  92. 20-Jul-2017

    Evidence

  93. 15-Jun-2017

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  94. 09-Mar-2017

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  95. 12-Jan-2017

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  96. 18-Nov-2016

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  97. 14-Oct-2016

    Evidence

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  98. 17-Sep-2016

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  99. 05-Aug-2016

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  100. 15-Jul-2016

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  101. 18-Jun-2016

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  102. 01-Apr-2016

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  103. 25-Feb-2016

    Issues

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  104. 12-Feb-2016

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  105. 08-Jan-2016

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  106. 19-Dec-2015

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  107. 19-Nov-2015

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  108. 05-Oct-2015

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  109. 24-Jun-2015

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  110. 13-Apr-2015

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  111. 04-Mar-2015

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  112. 04-Feb-2015

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  113. 28-Nov-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  114. 06-Nov-2014

    Order on T.I.View PDF

  115. 06-Nov-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  116. 05-Nov-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  117. 31-Oct-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  118. 17-Oct-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  119. 07-Oct-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  120. 06-Oct-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  121. 24-Sep-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  122. 17-Sep-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  123. 12-Sep-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  124. 25-Aug-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  125. 19-Aug-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  126. 07-Aug-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  127. 24-Jul-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  128. 17-Jul-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  129. 09-Jul-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  130. 30-Jun-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  131. 18-Jun-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  132. 09-Jun-2014

    Say / Hearing on Exh____Ready

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  133. 30-Apr-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  134. 24-Apr-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  135. 18-Apr-2014

    Hearing

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  136. 05-Apr-2014

    Written Statement

    Civil Judge J.D. Patur

  137. 24-Mar-2014

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  138. 21-Mar-2014

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1000018/2014

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the defendant's application (Exh.19) to amend the written statement under CPC Order 6 Rule 17, permitting clarification of the property boundary description from the southern side. The court found the amendment was just, reasonable, would assist in determining the real question in controversy, and would not change the nature of the suit. The defendant was directed to carry out the amendment by the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case