SHRDDHA PAWAN WANKHADE vs PAWAN BALDEV WANKHADE Advocate - Somani T K — 209/2024

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 02-Apr-2026 this date has passed

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHAK090019042024

e-Filing Number

24-11-2024

Filing Number

1391/2024

Filing Date

26-Nov-2024

Registration No

209/2024

Registration Date

26-Nov-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Murtijapur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHRDDHA PAWAN WANKHADE

    Adv. Mehare Sharad Mehare

  2. 2.BHAGYSHREE PAWAN WANKHADE

    Adv. Mahila v bal vikas vibhag

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PAWAN BALDEV WANKHADE Advocate - Somani T K

Case History

  1. 02-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  4. 19-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  5. 20-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  6. 26-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  7. 03-Nov-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary Shraddha Vs. Pavan (Cri. M.A. 209/2024) The application for interim monetary relief under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partly allowed. The court found prima-facie evidence that the applicant (wife) was subjected to domestic violence by the respondents (husband and in-laws) and granted her Rs. 2,500 per month as interim maintenance from the date of filing, instead of the Rs. 8,000 requested. The court also directed respondents not to commit any further acts of domestic violence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 03-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  9. 18-Oct-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  10. 15-Sep-2025

    Order on Exh

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  11. 30-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  12. 13-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  13. 30-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  14. 18-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  15. 07-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  16. 30-Jun-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  17. 12-Jun-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  18. 28-May-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  19. 19-May-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  20. 15-May-2025

    Report

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  21. 29-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  22. 29-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  23. 15-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  24. 03-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  25. 17-Feb-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  26. 03-Feb-2025

    Compliance

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  27. 07-Jan-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  28. 18-Dec-2024

    Awaiting Notice

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  29. 06-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  30. 27-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  31. 26-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 209/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Shraddha Vs. Pavan (Cri. M.A. 209/2024) The application for interim monetary relief under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partly allowed. The court found prima-facie evidence that the applicant (wife) was subjected to domestic violence by the respondents (husband and in-laws) and granted her Rs. 2,500 per month as interim maintenance from the date of filing, instead of the Rs. 8,000 requested. The court also directed respondents not to commit any further acts of domestic violence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case