SHRDDHA PAWAN WANKHADE vs PAWAN BALDEV WANKHADE Advocate - Somani T K — 209/2024

Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 02nd April 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHAK090019042024

Evidence

Next Hearing

02nd April 2026

e-Filing Number

24-11-2024

Filing Number

1391/2024

Filing Date

26-11-2024

Registration No

209/2024

Registration Date

26-11-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Murtijapur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

Acts & Sections

Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,22,23

Petitioner(s)

SHRDDHA PAWAN WANKHADE

Adv. Mehare Sharad Mehare

BHAGYSHREE PAWAN WANKHADE

Adv. Mahila v bal vikas vibhag

Respondent(s)

PAWAN BALDEV WANKHADE Advocate - Somani T K

Hearing History

Judge: 2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

06-03-2026

Evidence

16-02-2026

Evidence

19-01-2026

Evidence

20-12-2025

Evidence

26-11-2025

Evidence

Interim Orders

03-11-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary Shraddha Vs. Pavan (Cri. M.A. 209/2024) The application for interim monetary relief under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partly allowed. The court found prima-facie evidence that the applicant (wife) was subjected to domestic violence by the respondents (husband and in-laws) and granted her Rs. 2,500 per month as interim maintenance from the date of filing, instead of the Rs. 8,000 requested. The court also directed respondents not to commit any further acts of domestic violence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Shraddha Vs. Pavan (Cri. M.A. 209/2024) The application for interim monetary relief under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 was partly allowed. The court found prima-facie evidence that the applicant (wife) was subjected to domestic violence by the respondents (husband and in-laws) and granted her Rs. 2,500 per month as interim maintenance from the date of filing, instead of the Rs. 8,000 requested. The court also directed respondents not to commit any further acts of domestic violence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Murtijapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case