Bhaskar Nagoji Surjuse vs Arun Sonaji Jamnik Advocate - Ujwal Sadanshiv — 44/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section suit,for,declaration,and,injunction. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 30th March 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 30-Mar-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAK090011672023

Filing Number

243/2023

Filing Date

23-Jun-2023

Registration No

44/2023

Registration Date

23-Jun-2023

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Murtijapur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section suit,for,declaration,and,injunction

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Bhaskar Nagoji Surjuse

    Adv. Kambe S. R.

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Arun Sonaji Jamnik Advocate - Ujwal Sadanshiv

  2. 2.Sanjay Sonaji Jamnik

    Adv. Ujwal Sadanshiv

Case History

  1. 30-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  3. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  4. 20-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  5. 11-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  6. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  7. 16-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  8. 04-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  9. 21-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  10. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  11. 10-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  12. 11-Apr-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  13. 10-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  14. 07-Mar-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  15. 24-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  16. 19-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  17. 23-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  18. 20-Nov-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  19. 16-Oct-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  20. 19-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  21. 23-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  22. 20-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  23. 20-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  24. 06-May-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  25. 05-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  26. 21-Feb-2024

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  27. 24-Jan-2024

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  28. 19-Dec-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  29. 24-Nov-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  30. 17-Oct-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  31. 18-Sep-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  32. 16-Aug-2023

    Order on T.I.View PDF

    Summary The court granted temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining defendants from obstructing his peaceful possession of agricultural land in Akola district. The judge found the plaintiff has established a prima facie case based on 7/12 revenue records showing continuous cultivation since 1988 and the original owner's acknowledgment of plaintiff's possession, determining the balance of convenience favors protecting the plaintiff's possession until final trial decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  33. 16-Aug-2023

    Issues

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  34. 11-Aug-2023

    Order

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  35. 19-Jul-2023

    Order

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  36. 13-Jul-2023

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  37. 01-Jul-2023

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  38. 26-Jun-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  39. 23-Jun-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. 44/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court granted temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining defendants from obstructing his peaceful possession of agricultural land in Akola district. The judge found the plaintiff has established a prima facie case based on 7/12 revenue records showing continuous cultivation since 1988 and the original owner's acknowledgment of plaintiff's possession, determining the balance of convenience favors protecting the plaintiff's possession until final trial decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case