State of Maharashtra 3 vs Sureshrao purnaji pachade Advocate - D. D. Sawarkar — 97/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 326,324,504,506,34. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 04-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.C. - Reg.Cri.Case

CNR: MHAK090011532024

Filing Number

848/2024

Filing Date

05-Jul-2024

Registration No

97/2024

Registration Date

05-Jul-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Murtijapur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 326,324,504,506,34

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State of Maharashtra 3

    Adv. Government Pleader

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sureshrao purnaji pachade Advocate - D. D. Sawarkar

  2. 2.Amol Sureshrao pachade

    Adv. V. S. Polkat

  3. 3.Avinash sureshrao pachade

Case History

  1. 04-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  4. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  5. 31-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  6. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  7. 02-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  9. 29-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  10. 12-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  11. 05-Aug-2025

    Charge

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  12. 16-Jul-2025

    Charge

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  13. 23-Jun-2025

    Charge

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  14. 21-May-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: The accused's application for discharge under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code was rejected. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of offences under IPC Sections 324, 326, 504, and 506, including government hospital medical certificates documenting injuries, witness statements, and seizure of the wooden stick used in the assault. The charges were deemed not groundless, and the case proceeds against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  15. 21-May-2025

    Charge

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  16. 21-Apr-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  17. 21-Mar-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  18. 24-Feb-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  19. 10-Jan-2025

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  20. 08-Nov-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  21. 04-Oct-2024

    Awaiting Summons

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  22. 06-Jul-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 05-Jul-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 97/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The accused's application for discharge under Section 239 of the Criminal Procedure Code was rejected. The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of offences under IPC Sections 324, 326, 504, and 506, including government hospital medical certificates documenting injuries, witness statements, and seizure of the wooden stick used in the assault. The charges were deemed not groundless, and the case proceeds against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case