Vijay Vasantrao Nemade vs Hema Vijay Nemade Advocate - Rajesh D. Pawar — 36/2024

Case under Specific Relief Act Section 38,suit,for,permanent,mandatory,injunction. Status: Argument on Exh.____Unready. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.

Argument on Exh.____Unready Next hearing 09-Apr-2026 this date has passed

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAK090007672024

e-Filing Number

04-05-2024

Filing Number

227/2024

Filing Date

07-May-2024

Registration No

36/2024

Registration Date

07-May-2024

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Murtijapur

Judge

2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

Last updated 25-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Specific Relief Act Section 38,suit,for,permanent,mandatory,injunction

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Vijay Vasantrao Nemade

    Adv. PRAMOD DEVIDAS KORDE

  2. 2.Ram Vijay Nemade

    Adv. Pramod Devidas Korde

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Hema Vijay Nemade Advocate - Rajesh D. Pawar

Case History

  1. 09-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  3. 13-Feb-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  4. 09-Jan-2026

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  5. 01-Dec-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  6. 27-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  7. 19-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  9. 07-Nov-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  10. 31-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  11. 10-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  12. 04-Oct-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  13. 09-Sep-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  14. 08-Aug-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  15. 24-Jul-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  16. 26-Jun-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  17. 07-May-2025

    Argument on Exh.____Unready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  18. 07-Apr-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  19. 10-Mar-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  20. 24-Feb-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  21. 14-Feb-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  22. 24-Jan-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  23. 13-Jan-2025

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The court allowed the application filed by Ram Vijay Nemade under Order-I Rule-10 and Section 151 of the CPC to be added as a plaintiff in the injunction suit. The court found that the applicant, who claims to have received the suit property through a registered gift deed with mutation in his name, is a necessary party whose presence is essential for the court to effectively adjudicate all questions involved in the suit. The plaint was ordered to be amended accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  24. 13-Jan-2025

    Amended Plaint

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  25. 04-Jan-2025

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  26. 20-Dec-2024

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  27. 09-Dec-2024

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  28. 27-Nov-2024

    Reply/Say

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  29. 14-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  30. 04-Nov-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  31. 30-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  32. 25-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  33. 18-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  34. 09-Sep-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  35. 26-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  36. 14-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  37. 03-Aug-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  38. 15-Jul-2024

    Argument on Exh.____Ready

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  39. 04-Jul-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  40. 28-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  41. 10-Jun-2024

    Written Statement

    Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

  42. 08-May-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  43. 07-May-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 36/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the application filed by Ram Vijay Nemade under Order-I Rule-10 and Section 151 of the CPC to be added as a plaintiff in the injunction suit. The court found that the applicant, who claims to have received the suit property through a registered gift deed with mutation in his name, is a necessary party whose presence is essential for the court to effectively adjudicate all questions involved in the suit. The plaint was ordered to be amended accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case