Goutam Sukhdevrao Tayde vs Vinod Vasantrao Ingle Advocate - Pande P. J. — 30/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Suit,for,contineous,Permament,Injunction. Status: Defence Evidence. Next hearing: 01st April 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHAK090007072023
Filing Number
156/2023
Filing Date
31-Mar-2023
Registration No
30/2023
Registration Date
01-Apr-2023
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Murtijapur
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Goutam Sukhdevrao Tayde
Adv. Wankhade G. P.
Respondent(s)
-
1.Vinod Vasantrao Ingle Advocate - Pande P. J.
-
2.Narmadabai Ramesh Ingle
Adv. Pande P. J.
-
3.Vilas Ramesh Ingle
Adv. Pande P. J.
Case History
-
01-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Defence Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
25-Feb-2026
Arguments
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
05-Jan-2026
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
27-Nov-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
28-Oct-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
22-Sep-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
17-Jul-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
16-Jun-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
07-Apr-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
06-Mar-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
11-Feb-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
17-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
02-Jan-2025
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
24-Oct-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
08-Oct-2024
Order on T.I.View PDF
Case Summary: RCS No. 30/2023 (Goutam v. Vinod) The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima-facie case of ownership and possession of the agricultural land property (S.No. 52, Block 183, Rajura Sarode, Akola District), supported by 7/12 extracts, sale deeds, and mutation entries. The court determined that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff and that he would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were not granted. The defendant and any person acting on their behalf are permanently restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's possession of the suit property pending final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Oct-2024
Evidence
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
07-Oct-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
25-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
19-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
10-Sep-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
04-Sep-2024
Order on Exh
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
22-Aug-2024
Order on Exh
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
24-Jul-2024
Order on Exh
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
18-Jul-2024
Argument on Exh.____Ready
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
14-Jun-2024
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
03-May-2024
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
08-Apr-2024
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
26-Mar-2024
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
05-Mar-2024
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
05-Feb-2024
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
23-Jan-2024
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
18-Dec-2023
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
28-Nov-2023
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
25-Oct-2023
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
27-Sep-2023
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
04-Sep-2023
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
04-Aug-2023
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
15-Jul-2023
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
10-Jul-2023
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
17-Jun-2023
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
06-Jun-2023
Hearing
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
04-May-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
29-Apr-2023
W.S. and Say
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
20-Apr-2023
Awaiting Summons
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
15-Apr-2023
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Mar-2023
Case filed
Registration No. 30/2023
Case Summary: RCS No. 30/2023 (Goutam v. Vinod) The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff. The court found that the plaintiff established a prima-facie case of ownership and possession of the agricultural land property (S.No. 52, Block 183, Rajura Sarode, Akola District), supported by 7/12 extracts, sale deeds, and mutation entries. The court determined that the balance of convenience favored the plaintiff and that he would suffer irreparable loss if the injunction were not granted. The defendant and any person acting on their behalf are permanently restrained from obstructing the plaintiff's possession of the suit property pending final disposal of the suit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts