Sunil Ramdas Banubakode vs Anil Motiram Chaudhari Advocate - SUKHSOHALE N P — 7/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section SUIT FORM PERMANENT AND PERPETUAL INJUNCTION,APPLICATION UO 39 RULE 1 AND 2 RW SECTION 151 OF CPC FOR GRANT OF TI. Status: Written Statement. Next hearing: 04th April 2026.

R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit

CNR: MHAK090005302025

Written Statement

Next Hearing

04th April 2026

e-Filing Number

01-03-2025

Filing Number

132/2025

Filing Date

01-03-2025

Registration No

7/2025

Registration Date

01-03-2025

Court

Civil Court Junior Division , Murtijapur

Judge

1-Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section SUIT FORM PERMANENT AND PERPETUAL INJUNCTION,APPLICATION UO 39 RULE 1 AND 2 RW SECTION 151 OF CPC FOR GRANT OF TI

Petitioner(s)

Sunil Ramdas Banubakode

Adv. DESHMUKH D L

Respondent(s)

Anil Motiram Chaudhari Advocate - SUKHSOHALE N P

Pramila Harichandra Chaudhari

Madhuri Praful Thakre

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur

16-03-2026

Written Statement

06-03-2026

Written Statement

20-02-2026

Written Statement

10-02-2026

Written Statement

22-01-2026

Written Statement

Interim Orders

09-12-2025
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: RCS No.7/2025 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC. The suit's nature was converted from seeking permanent injunction to seeking declaration and possession of the property. Two necessary parties (the original vendors) were added as defendants, and the plaintiff was permitted to file the amended plaint within 15 days, with the existing defendant given 30 days to file an additional written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: RCS No.7/2025 Outcome: The court allowed the plaintiff's application for amendment under Order VI Rule 17 of the CPC. The suit's nature was converted from seeking permanent injunction to seeking declaration and possession of the property. Two necessary parties (the original vendors) were added as defendants, and the plaintiff was permitted to file the amended plaint within 15 days, with the existing defendant given 30 days to file an additional written statement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Court Junior Division , Murtijapur All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case