Babanrao Dadarao Deshmukh vs Pradip Manikrao Deshmukh — 47/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 318(4)61(2)AND3/5OFBNSS. Status: Reply/Say. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHAK090005192025
e-Filing Number
27-02-2025
Filing Number
390/2025
Filing Date
27-Feb-2025
Registration No
47/2025
Registration Date
27-Feb-2025
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Murtijapur
Judge
1-Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Babanrao Dadarao Deshmukh
Adv. PANDE PAWANKUMAR JAGDISHPRASAD
Respondent(s)
-
1.Pradip Manikrao Deshmukh
Case History
-
17-Apr-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
28-Jan-2026
Reply/Say
Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
23-Dec-2025
Reply/Say
Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
21-Nov-2025
Reply/Say
Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
22-Sep-2025
EvidenceView PDF
The petition under IPC Section 223 was dismissed. The court found that the complainant's allegations of fraud and deception by the two accused parties lacked substantive evidence, and the matter appeared to involve personal/family disputes rather than criminal misconduct. The court directed that appropriate action be taken against the accused as per law, but declined to proceed with the formal complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Sep-2025
Order
Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
19-Aug-2025
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
07-Jul-2025
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
24-Jun-2025
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
05-Jun-2025
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
22-Apr-2025
Verification
Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
10-Mar-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Feb-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 47/2025
The petition under IPC Section 223 was dismissed. The court found that the complainant's allegations of fraud and deception by the two accused parties lacked substantive evidence, and the matter appeared to involve personal/family disputes rather than criminal misconduct. The court directed that appropriate action be taken against the accused as per law, but declined to proceed with the formal complaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts