Prabha Ganesh Giri vs Nil — 4/2026
Case under Bombay Regulation Act,1827 Section 2. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 17th March 2026.
Civil M.A.
CNR: MHAK090000202026
e-Filing Number
02-01-2026
Filing Number
12/2026
Filing Date
03-Jan-2026
Registration No
4/2026
Registration Date
05-Jan-2026
Court
Civil Court Junior Division , Murtijapur
Judge
2-Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
Decision Date
17-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Last updated 25-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Prabha Ganesh Giri
Adv. PATIL PRADIP PRALHADRAO
-
2.Sachitanand ganesh Giri
Adv. PATIL PRADIP PRALHADRAO
-
3.Savita Santosh giri
Adv. PATIL PRADIP PRALHADRAO
-
4.Sharda nitin puri
Adv. PATIL PRADIP PRALHADRAO
Respondent(s)
-
1.Nil
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
17-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
The court granted the petition filed under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, Section 2, for issuance of a certificate of heirship. The court found that the applicants (wife and children of the deceased Ganesh Purnangi Giray, who died on 07.09.2025) are the sole legal heirs with no other surviving heirs, and therefore declared them entitled to the heirship certificate for authorized and financial purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Disposed
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
06-Mar-2026
Order
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
26-Feb-2026
Notification / Publication
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
17-Feb-2026
Notification / Publication
Jt. Civil Judge J.D. Murtizapur
-
09-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Jan-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 4/2026
The court granted the petition filed under the Bombay Regulation Act, 1827, Section 2, for issuance of a certificate of heirship. The court found that the applicants (wife and children of the deceased Ganesh Purnangi Giray, who died on 07.09.2025) are the sole legal heirs with no other surviving heirs, and therefore declared them entitled to the heirship certificate for authorized and financial purposes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts